Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Narratologische Untersuchungskriterien in Relation zu wirkungs- und rezeptionsästhetischen Konzeptionen:Eine literaturtheoretische Gegenüberstellung anhand von Kanki Takurōs Kurzgeschichte “Der Schlüssel” (Kagi, 1986)


Meyer, H (2009). Narratologische Untersuchungskriterien in Relation zu wirkungs- und rezeptionsästhetischen Konzeptionen:Eine literaturtheoretische Gegenüberstellung anhand von Kanki Takurōs Kurzgeschichte “Der Schlüssel” (Kagi, 1986). Asiatische Studien / Études Asiatiques, 63(3.2009):671-697.

Abstract

Narrativity constitutes an important common feature of historiography and literature. According to Hayden White’s theory of emplotment, historiography must therefore be considered as a substantially fiction-making operation. Investigation criteria of mainly German narrative theories (Käte Hamburger, Franz K. Stanzel, Ansgar Nünning and others) show, however, that fictional narrativity uses specific techniques which do not appear within historiography but prove to be extremely important to distinguish history from fiction. These criteria can easily be used as a means to analyze literary texts, especially if compared to Wolfgang Iser’s more abstract theory of aesthetic response (“Wirkungsgeschichte”) and Hans Robert Jauss’ reception-aesthetics (“Rezeptionsästhetik”). What distinguishes these different directions of literary theories and which areas does narratology not cover? What are the difficulties when reception theories are applied compared to narratological criteria? Kanki Takurō’s short story “The Key” (Kagi, 1986) may serve as an example for narratological investigations together with an examination of the ways in which literary works are received by readers.

Abstract

Narrativity constitutes an important common feature of historiography and literature. According to Hayden White’s theory of emplotment, historiography must therefore be considered as a substantially fiction-making operation. Investigation criteria of mainly German narrative theories (Käte Hamburger, Franz K. Stanzel, Ansgar Nünning and others) show, however, that fictional narrativity uses specific techniques which do not appear within historiography but prove to be extremely important to distinguish history from fiction. These criteria can easily be used as a means to analyze literary texts, especially if compared to Wolfgang Iser’s more abstract theory of aesthetic response (“Wirkungsgeschichte”) and Hans Robert Jauss’ reception-aesthetics (“Rezeptionsästhetik”). What distinguishes these different directions of literary theories and which areas does narratology not cover? What are the difficulties when reception theories are applied compared to narratological criteria? Kanki Takurō’s short story “The Key” (Kagi, 1986) may serve as an example for narratological investigations together with an examination of the ways in which literary works are received by readers.

Statistics

Downloads

366 downloads since deposited on 09 Nov 2009
21 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:Journals > Asiatische Studien / Études Asiatiques > Archive > 63 (2009) > 3
Dewey Decimal Classification:950 History of Asia
Language:German
Date:2009
Deposited On:09 Nov 2009 09:56
Last Modified:17 Feb 2018 23:16
Publisher:Schweizerische Asiengesellschaft / Verlag Peter Lang
ISSN:0004-4717
OA Status:Green
Related URLs:http://www.sagw.ch/de/asiengesellschaft/publikationen/Asiatische-Studien.html (Publisher)
http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?vID=86850&vLang=D&vHR=1&vUR=4&vUUR=11 (Publisher)

Download

Download PDF  'Narratologische Untersuchungskriterien in Relation zu wirkungs- und rezeptionsästhetischen Konzeptionen:Eine literaturtheoretische Gegenüberstellung anhand von Kanki Takurōs Kurzgeschichte “Der Schlüssel” (Kagi, 1986)'.
Preview
Filetype: PDF
Size: 185kB