Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Measuring dyadic coping: The factorial structure of Bodenmann's "Dyadic Coping Questionnaire" in an Italian sample - Zurich Open Repository and Archive


Donato, S; Iafrate, R; Barni, D; Bertoni, A; Bodenmann, Guy; Gagliardi, S (2009). Measuring dyadic coping: The factorial structure of Bodenmann's "Dyadic Coping Questionnaire" in an Italian sample. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 16:25-47.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyze the factorial structure of the Dyadic Coping Questionnaire (FDCT-N) (Bodenmann, 1997, 2000) in an Italian sample. The FDCT-N measures partners’ tendency to engage in dyadic coping, that is the process through which partners cope together, as a couple, with daily stressors. It comprises partners’ stress communication, positive and negative coping responses, and common dyadic coping. Positive and negative dyadic coping items are measured both as perceptions of one’s own coping styles and as perceptions of the partner’s styles. The sample was composed of 389 heterosexual couples (N = 778 participants) living in the North of Italy. The factorial structure was examined through a confirmatory factor analysis, which showed a good overall fit for a five-factor model (stress communication; emotion-focused dyadic coping; problem-focused dyadic coping; delegated dyadic coping; and negative dyadic coping) for self-perceptions and perceptions of the other and a three-factor model (problem-focused; seeking closeness; and relaxation) for common dyadic coping.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyze the factorial structure of the Dyadic Coping Questionnaire (FDCT-N) (Bodenmann, 1997, 2000) in an Italian sample. The FDCT-N measures partners’ tendency to engage in dyadic coping, that is the process through which partners cope together, as a couple, with daily stressors. It comprises partners’ stress communication, positive and negative coping responses, and common dyadic coping. Positive and negative dyadic coping items are measured both as perceptions of one’s own coping styles and as perceptions of the partner’s styles. The sample was composed of 389 heterosexual couples (N = 778 participants) living in the North of Italy. The factorial structure was examined through a confirmatory factor analysis, which showed a good overall fit for a five-factor model (stress communication; emotion-focused dyadic coping; problem-focused dyadic coping; delegated dyadic coping; and negative dyadic coping) for self-perceptions and perceptions of the other and a three-factor model (problem-focused; seeking closeness; and relaxation) for common dyadic coping.

Citations

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Language:Italian
Date:2009
Deposited On:14 Dec 2009 14:36
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 13:34
Publisher:Cises Srl
ISSN:1972-6325
Official URL:http://www.tpmap.org/articoli/2009/Vol16.1%20A2.htm

Download

Full text not available from this repository.

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations