Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

I know what you want to know: The impact of interviewees’ ability to identify criteria on interview performance and construct-related validity


Melchers, K G; Klehe, U C; Richter, M; Kleinmann, Martin; König, C J; Lievens, P (2009). I know what you want to know: The impact of interviewees’ ability to identify criteria on interview performance and construct-related validity. Human Performance, 22(4):355-374.

Abstract

The current study tested whether candidates' ability to identify the targeted interview dimensions fosters their interview success as well as the interviews' convergent and discriminant validity. Ninety-two interviewees participated in a simulated structured interview developed to measure three different dimensions. In line with the hypotheses, interviewees who were more proficient at identifying the targeted dimensions received better evaluations. Furthermore, interviewees' ability to identify these evaluation criteria accounted for substantial variance in predicting their performance even after controlling for cognitive ability. Finally, the interviewer ratings showed poor discriminant and convergent validity. However, we found some support for the hypothesis that the quality of the interviewer ratings improves when one only considers ratings from questions for which interviewees had correctly identified the intended dimensions.

Abstract

The current study tested whether candidates' ability to identify the targeted interview dimensions fosters their interview success as well as the interviews' convergent and discriminant validity. Ninety-two interviewees participated in a simulated structured interview developed to measure three different dimensions. In line with the hypotheses, interviewees who were more proficient at identifying the targeted dimensions received better evaluations. Furthermore, interviewees' ability to identify these evaluation criteria accounted for substantial variance in predicting their performance even after controlling for cognitive ability. Finally, the interviewer ratings showed poor discriminant and convergent validity. However, we found some support for the hypothesis that the quality of the interviewer ratings improves when one only considers ratings from questions for which interviewees had correctly identified the intended dimensions.

Statistics

Citations

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Language:English
Date:September 2009
Deposited On:27 Jan 2010 07:46
Last Modified:06 Dec 2017 22:42
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:0895-9285
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280903120295
Other Identification Number:AN 44033102

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher