Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Preserved cardiac synchrony and function with single-site left ventricular epicardial pacing during mid-term follow-up in paediatric patients


Tomaske, M; Breithardt, O A; Bauersfeld, U (2009). Preserved cardiac synchrony and function with single-site left ventricular epicardial pacing during mid-term follow-up in paediatric patients. Europace, 11(9):1168-1176.

Abstract

AIMS: Right ventricular (RV) pacing may cause dyssynchronous left ventricular (LV) contraction and systolic dysfunction. Left ventricular-based pacing may prevent such deterioration. The aim of this study was to evaluate ventricular synchrony and function with permanent LV pacing (LVP) vs. RV pacing (RVP) in paediatric patients with normal cardiac anatomy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five paediatric patients with normal cardiac anatomy and single-site epicardial RV apex pacing (RVP, n=10, pacing duration: 7.9+/-2.9 years) or LV free wall pacing (LVP, n=15, pacing duration: 4.3+/-2.6 years) for complete heart block were enrolled. A total of 15 healthy children served as a control group. Conventional echocardiography, myocardial circumferential (LV), and longitudinal (RV) 2D strain (2Ds) analysis were obtained. Paced QRS duration did not differ between groups (P=0.915). Interventricular mechanical delay (LVP: 17+/-10, RVP: 62+/-15 ms; P<0.0001), septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (LVP: 59+/-23, RVP: 294+/-84 ms; P<0.0001), septal-to-lateral wall motion delay (LVP: 40+/-19, RVP: 59+/-12 ms; P=0.009), and LV mechanical delay (LVP: 35+/-9, RVP: 63+/-17 ms; P<0.0001) were preserved for LVP but not for RVP. Right ventricular mechanical delay was similar among paced groups (P=0.639). Left ventricular ejection fraction was normal for LVP but not for RVP (LVP: 60+/-6%, RVP: 45+/-6%; P=0.012). Left ventricular pacing did not differ from controls for synchrony or function. CONCLUSION: Conventional and 2Ds echocardiographic measurements indicate preserved LV synchrony and function in paediatric patients with LVP compared with RVP. Permanent LVP has no impact on RV synchrony.

Abstract

AIMS: Right ventricular (RV) pacing may cause dyssynchronous left ventricular (LV) contraction and systolic dysfunction. Left ventricular-based pacing may prevent such deterioration. The aim of this study was to evaluate ventricular synchrony and function with permanent LV pacing (LVP) vs. RV pacing (RVP) in paediatric patients with normal cardiac anatomy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five paediatric patients with normal cardiac anatomy and single-site epicardial RV apex pacing (RVP, n=10, pacing duration: 7.9+/-2.9 years) or LV free wall pacing (LVP, n=15, pacing duration: 4.3+/-2.6 years) for complete heart block were enrolled. A total of 15 healthy children served as a control group. Conventional echocardiography, myocardial circumferential (LV), and longitudinal (RV) 2D strain (2Ds) analysis were obtained. Paced QRS duration did not differ between groups (P=0.915). Interventricular mechanical delay (LVP: 17+/-10, RVP: 62+/-15 ms; P<0.0001), septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (LVP: 59+/-23, RVP: 294+/-84 ms; P<0.0001), septal-to-lateral wall motion delay (LVP: 40+/-19, RVP: 59+/-12 ms; P=0.009), and LV mechanical delay (LVP: 35+/-9, RVP: 63+/-17 ms; P<0.0001) were preserved for LVP but not for RVP. Right ventricular mechanical delay was similar among paced groups (P=0.639). Left ventricular ejection fraction was normal for LVP but not for RVP (LVP: 60+/-6%, RVP: 45+/-6%; P=0.012). Left ventricular pacing did not differ from controls for synchrony or function. CONCLUSION: Conventional and 2Ds echocardiographic measurements indicate preserved LV synchrony and function in paediatric patients with LVP compared with RVP. Permanent LVP has no impact on RV synchrony.

Statistics

Citations

22 citations in Web of Science®
21 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Children's Hospital Zurich > Medical Clinic
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2009
Deposited On:22 Feb 2010 13:25
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 13:59
Publisher:Oxford University Press
ISSN:1099-5129
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup178
PubMed ID:19570808

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher