Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids


Luts, H; Eneman, K; Wouters, J; Schulte, M; Vormann, M; Buechler, M; Dillier, N; Houben, R; Dreschler, W A; Froehlich, M; Puder, H; Grimm, G; Hohmann, V; Leijon, A; Lombard, A; Mauler, D; Spriet, A (2010). Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(3):1491-1505.

Abstract

In the framework of the European HearCom project, promising signal enhancement algorithms were developed and evaluated for future use in hearing instruments. To assess the algorithms' performance, five of the algorithms were selected and implemented on a common real-time hardware/software platform. Four test centers in Belgium, The Netherlands, Germany, and Switzerland perceptually evaluated the algorithms. Listening tests were performed with large numbers of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Three perceptual measures were used: speech reception threshold (SRT), listening effort scaling, and preference rating. Tests were carried out in two types of rooms. Speech was presented in multitalker babble arriving from one or three loudspeakers. In a pseudo-diffuse noise scenario, only one algorithm, the spatially preprocessed speech-distortion-weighted multi-channel Wiener filtering, provided a SRT improvement relative to the unprocessed condition. Despite the general lack of improvement in SRT, some algorithms were preferred over the unprocessed condition at all tested signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). These effects were found across different subject groups and test sites. The listening effort scores were less consistent over test sites. For the algorithms that did not affect speech intelligibility, a reduction in listening effort was observed at 0 dB SNR.

©2010 Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

In the framework of the European HearCom project, promising signal enhancement algorithms were developed and evaluated for future use in hearing instruments. To assess the algorithms' performance, five of the algorithms were selected and implemented on a common real-time hardware/software platform. Four test centers in Belgium, The Netherlands, Germany, and Switzerland perceptually evaluated the algorithms. Listening tests were performed with large numbers of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Three perceptual measures were used: speech reception threshold (SRT), listening effort scaling, and preference rating. Tests were carried out in two types of rooms. Speech was presented in multitalker babble arriving from one or three loudspeakers. In a pseudo-diffuse noise scenario, only one algorithm, the spatially preprocessed speech-distortion-weighted multi-channel Wiener filtering, provided a SRT improvement relative to the unprocessed condition. Despite the general lack of improvement in SRT, some algorithms were preferred over the unprocessed condition at all tested signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). These effects were found across different subject groups and test sites. The listening effort scores were less consistent over test sites. For the algorithms that did not affect speech intelligibility, a reduction in listening effort was observed at 0 dB SNR.

©2010 Acoustical Society of America

Statistics

Citations

56 citations in Web of Science®
58 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 25 Mar 2010
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:23 March 2010
Deposited On:25 Mar 2010 15:08
Last Modified:07 Dec 2017 01:59
Publisher:Acoustical Society of America
ISSN:0001-4966
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3299168
Official URL:http://link.aip.org/link/?JAS/127/1491
Related URLs:http://link.aip.org/link/?JAS/127/3/htmltoc (Publisher)

Download