Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Reproductive competition favours solitary living while ecological constraints impose group-living in African striped mice


Schradin, C; König, B; Pillay, N (2010). Reproductive competition favours solitary living while ecological constraints impose group-living in African striped mice. Journal of Animal Ecology, 79(3):515-521.

Abstract

1. Social groups typically form due to delayed dispersal of adult offspring when no opportunities for independent breeding exist, or the costs of dispersal are higher than the costs of remaining philopatric. Ecological constraints are thought to be a main reason for group-living in animals.
2. Reproductive competition within groups can induce high costs of philopatry, and is thought to be a main reason for solitary living.
3. Experimental manipulation of reproductive competition is difficult. One solution is to compare sociality between periods with and without reproductive competition.
4. Here, we show empirically in a 8 year field study that striped mice (Rhabdomys pumilio) of both sexes were group-living during the breeding season when population density was high but solitary living when population density was low, supporting the ecological constraints model.
5. After the breeding season, in the absence of reproductive competition, the positive correlation between population density and percentage of group-living striped mice was absent. Almost all striped mice were group-living even under very low population densities. This supports the reproductive competition model.
6. Ambient temperature, food availability and predation pressure, did not influence sociality.
7. In captivity, the costs of reproductive competition in communal groups include female infanticide and aggression between females.
8. We conclude that group-living is favoured by constraints imposed through habitat saturation and by its benefits (improved thermoregulation by huddling, group-territoriality and predator avoidance), and that reproductive competition is a major force favouring solitary living in striped mice.

Abstract

1. Social groups typically form due to delayed dispersal of adult offspring when no opportunities for independent breeding exist, or the costs of dispersal are higher than the costs of remaining philopatric. Ecological constraints are thought to be a main reason for group-living in animals.
2. Reproductive competition within groups can induce high costs of philopatry, and is thought to be a main reason for solitary living.
3. Experimental manipulation of reproductive competition is difficult. One solution is to compare sociality between periods with and without reproductive competition.
4. Here, we show empirically in a 8 year field study that striped mice (Rhabdomys pumilio) of both sexes were group-living during the breeding season when population density was high but solitary living when population density was low, supporting the ecological constraints model.
5. After the breeding season, in the absence of reproductive competition, the positive correlation between population density and percentage of group-living striped mice was absent. Almost all striped mice were group-living even under very low population densities. This supports the reproductive competition model.
6. Ambient temperature, food availability and predation pressure, did not influence sociality.
7. In captivity, the costs of reproductive competition in communal groups include female infanticide and aggression between females.
8. We conclude that group-living is favoured by constraints imposed through habitat saturation and by its benefits (improved thermoregulation by huddling, group-territoriality and predator avoidance), and that reproductive competition is a major force favouring solitary living in striped mice.

Statistics

Citations

47 citations in Web of Science®
48 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

3 downloads since deposited on 26 Mar 2010
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
590 Animals (Zoology)
Uncontrolled Keywords:helper; flexibility; communal nesting; cooperative breeding
Language:English
Date:1 May 2010
Deposited On:26 Mar 2010 13:58
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:04
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:0021-8790
Additional Information:The full text of the Article will be made freely available via Blackwell-Synergy 2 years after publication.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01651.x

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 1MB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations