Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode


Alkadhi, H; Stolzmann, P; Desbiolles, L; Baumueller, S; Goetti, R; Plass, A; Scheffel, H; Feuchtner, G; Falk, V; Marincek, B; Leschka, S (2010). Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart, 96(12):933-938.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and radiation doses of two low-dose protocols for coronary artery imaging with second-generation, dual-source CT in comparison with catheter angiography (CA). DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Prospective, single-centre study conducted in a referral centre enrolling 100 patients with low-to-intermediate risk and suspicion of coronary artery disease. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography and CA. Patients were randomly assigned to two different low-dose CT protocols (each 100 kV/320 mA): in group A (n=50), CT was performed using the prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-gated step-and-shoot (SAS) mode; in group B (n=50), CT was performed using the prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch mode (pitch 3.4). The image quality and presence or absence of significant coronary stenosis in all coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers. CA served as the standard of reference. RESULTS: Sixty-one significant stenoses were found in group A, and 69 in group B. There was no significant difference in age (group A, 62+/-8 yrs; group B, 63+/-8 yrs; p=0.72), body mass index (group A, 26.4+/-3.1 kg/m2; group B, 25.9+/-2.8 kg/m2; p=0.41) and heart rate (HR) (group A, 58+/-8 bpm; group B, 56+/-10 bpm; p=0.66) between the groups. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 98.6% (651/660) of segments in group A and in 98.9% (642/649) in group B, with no significant differences between groups. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 94%, 91%, 85% and 97% per-patient in group A, and 93%, 94%, 89% and 97% per-patient in group B (no significant differences). The effective radiation dose in group B (0.9+/-0.1 mSv) was significantly (p<0.01) lower than that in group A (1.4+/-0.4 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: Both the high-pitch and the SAS mode for low-dose CT coronary angiography provide high accuracy for the assessment of significant coronary stenoses, while the high-pitch mode further significantly lowers the radiation dose.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and radiation doses of two low-dose protocols for coronary artery imaging with second-generation, dual-source CT in comparison with catheter angiography (CA). DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Prospective, single-centre study conducted in a referral centre enrolling 100 patients with low-to-intermediate risk and suspicion of coronary artery disease. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography and CA. Patients were randomly assigned to two different low-dose CT protocols (each 100 kV/320 mA): in group A (n=50), CT was performed using the prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-gated step-and-shoot (SAS) mode; in group B (n=50), CT was performed using the prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch mode (pitch 3.4). The image quality and presence or absence of significant coronary stenosis in all coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers. CA served as the standard of reference. RESULTS: Sixty-one significant stenoses were found in group A, and 69 in group B. There was no significant difference in age (group A, 62+/-8 yrs; group B, 63+/-8 yrs; p=0.72), body mass index (group A, 26.4+/-3.1 kg/m2; group B, 25.9+/-2.8 kg/m2; p=0.41) and heart rate (HR) (group A, 58+/-8 bpm; group B, 56+/-10 bpm; p=0.66) between the groups. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 98.6% (651/660) of segments in group A and in 98.9% (642/649) in group B, with no significant differences between groups. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 94%, 91%, 85% and 97% per-patient in group A, and 93%, 94%, 89% and 97% per-patient in group B (no significant differences). The effective radiation dose in group B (0.9+/-0.1 mSv) was significantly (p<0.01) lower than that in group A (1.4+/-0.4 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: Both the high-pitch and the SAS mode for low-dose CT coronary angiography provide high accuracy for the assessment of significant coronary stenoses, while the high-pitch mode further significantly lowers the radiation dose.

Statistics

Citations

110 citations in Web of Science®
132 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 08 Jul 2010
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2010
Deposited On:08 Jul 2010 16:04
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:10
Publisher:BMJ Publishing Group
ISSN:1355-6037
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.189100
PubMed ID:20538669

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 1MB
View at publisher