Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Effect of artificial aging regimens on the performance of self-etching adhesives


Ulker, M; Özcan, M; Sengün, A; Ozer, F; Belli, S (2010). Effect of artificial aging regimens on the performance of self-etching adhesives. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 93(1):175-184.

Abstract

This in vitro study was performed to compare the microtensile bond strengths (MTBS) of current self-etching adhesives to dentin and to evaluate the effects of artificial aging [(thermocycling (TC) and/or mechanic loading (ML)] on MTBS and on nanoleakage of self-etching adhesives. Two-step (AdheSE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, Clearfil SE Bond, Optibond Self-Etch) and one-step (Hybrid Bond, G-bond, Clearfil Tri-S Bond, and Adper Prompt L-Pop) self-etching adhesives were tested. Resin composite build-ups were created, and the specimens were subjected to 10(4) TC, 10(5) ML, and 10(4)/10(5) TC/ML. Non-aged specimens served as controls. In the control group, no significant differences were found among the MTBS of the one-step self-etching adhesives and among those of three two-step self-etching adhesives (AdheSE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, and Clearfil SE Bond) (p > 0.05). The MTBS of AdheSE Bond and Clearfil Protect Bond were higher than were those of all one-step self-etching adhesives and than those of Optibond Self-Etch. The MTBS of Clearfil SE Bond was higher than were those of two one-step self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, G-bond) (p < 0.05). Compared with the non-aged controls, TC did not decrease (p > 0.05), but ML and TC/ML significantly decreased the MTBS of the adhesives tested (p < 0.05). Two-step self-etching adhesives tended to fail more cohesively in dentin. Transmission electron microscopy revealed different nanoleakage patterns in the adhesive and hybrid layers of all adhesives examined, and signs of additional silver-filled water channels were more readily detectable after TC/ML.

Abstract

This in vitro study was performed to compare the microtensile bond strengths (MTBS) of current self-etching adhesives to dentin and to evaluate the effects of artificial aging [(thermocycling (TC) and/or mechanic loading (ML)] on MTBS and on nanoleakage of self-etching adhesives. Two-step (AdheSE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, Clearfil SE Bond, Optibond Self-Etch) and one-step (Hybrid Bond, G-bond, Clearfil Tri-S Bond, and Adper Prompt L-Pop) self-etching adhesives were tested. Resin composite build-ups were created, and the specimens were subjected to 10(4) TC, 10(5) ML, and 10(4)/10(5) TC/ML. Non-aged specimens served as controls. In the control group, no significant differences were found among the MTBS of the one-step self-etching adhesives and among those of three two-step self-etching adhesives (AdheSE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, and Clearfil SE Bond) (p > 0.05). The MTBS of AdheSE Bond and Clearfil Protect Bond were higher than were those of all one-step self-etching adhesives and than those of Optibond Self-Etch. The MTBS of Clearfil SE Bond was higher than were those of two one-step self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, G-bond) (p < 0.05). Compared with the non-aged controls, TC did not decrease (p > 0.05), but ML and TC/ML significantly decreased the MTBS of the adhesives tested (p < 0.05). Two-step self-etching adhesives tended to fail more cohesively in dentin. Transmission electron microscopy revealed different nanoleakage patterns in the adhesive and hybrid layers of all adhesives examined, and signs of additional silver-filled water channels were more readily detectable after TC/ML.

Statistics

Citations

20 citations in Web of Science®
25 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

2 downloads since deposited on 06 Feb 2011
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2010
Deposited On:06 Feb 2011 11:31
Last Modified:07 Dec 2017 06:59
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:1552-4973
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31572
PubMed ID:20091912

Download