Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Selection for monoculture and mixture genotypes in a biodiversity experiment


Lipowsky, A; Schmid, B; Roscher, C (2011). Selection for monoculture and mixture genotypes in a biodiversity experiment. Basic and Applied Ecology, 12(12):360-371.

Abstract

Studies in experimental grasslands have shown variation in plant individual performance in response to neighbourhood diversity. To which extent these responses are due to phenotypic plasticity or genetic variation is largely unknown. We collected seed families of five herbaceous species (Cirsium oleraceum, Crepis biennis, Plantago lanceolata, Plantago media and Rumex acetosa) in monocultures and 60-species mixtures 5 years after establishment and replanted or transplanted the offspring into the same monocultures and 60-species mixtures. In all five species the actual environment significantly affected plant survival, growth and performance in terms of shoot biomass and investment into reproduction, indicating stronger
competition for light and different levels of herbivory in mixtures as compared with monocultures. Effects of the original environment were smaller and less consistent, but indicated differential selection in monocultures vs. mixtures. The interaction between actual and original environment, corresponding to the “home” vs. “away” comparison, was rarely significant, yet this was providing a first sign of local adaptation. We conclude that, for the investigated plant species, more than five growing seasons in monocultures or mixtures would be needed to better demonstrate the selection of genotypes specifically adapted to monocultures or mixtures. A faster local adaptation may have been prevented by the ability of these species to respond to variation in neighbourhood diversity to a large degree via phenotypic plasticity and other factors.

Abstract

Studies in experimental grasslands have shown variation in plant individual performance in response to neighbourhood diversity. To which extent these responses are due to phenotypic plasticity or genetic variation is largely unknown. We collected seed families of five herbaceous species (Cirsium oleraceum, Crepis biennis, Plantago lanceolata, Plantago media and Rumex acetosa) in monocultures and 60-species mixtures 5 years after establishment and replanted or transplanted the offspring into the same monocultures and 60-species mixtures. In all five species the actual environment significantly affected plant survival, growth and performance in terms of shoot biomass and investment into reproduction, indicating stronger
competition for light and different levels of herbivory in mixtures as compared with monocultures. Effects of the original environment were smaller and less consistent, but indicated differential selection in monocultures vs. mixtures. The interaction between actual and original environment, corresponding to the “home” vs. “away” comparison, was rarely significant, yet this was providing a first sign of local adaptation. We conclude that, for the investigated plant species, more than five growing seasons in monocultures or mixtures would be needed to better demonstrate the selection of genotypes specifically adapted to monocultures or mixtures. A faster local adaptation may have been prevented by the ability of these species to respond to variation in neighbourhood diversity to a large degree via phenotypic plasticity and other factors.

Statistics

Citations

12 citations in Web of Science®
12 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

145 downloads since deposited on 21 Jul 2011
29 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
590 Animals (Zoology)
Uncontrolled Keywords:genetic variation, local adaptation, mixture, monoculture, phenotypic plasticity, reciprocal transplant experiment
Language:English
Date:2011
Deposited On:21 Jul 2011 10:18
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:57
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1439-1791
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2011.03.005

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 1MB
View at publisher