Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Electrolyzed water and its application in the food industry


Hricova, D; Stephan, R; Zweifel, C (2008). Electrolyzed water and its application in the food industry. Journal of Food Protection, 71(9):1934-1947.

Abstract

Electrolyzed water (EW) is gaining popularity as a sanitizer in the food industries of many countries. By electrolysis a dilute sodium chloride solution dissociates into acidic electrolyzed water (AEW; pH 2 to 3; oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) >1100 mV; active chlorine content 10-90 ppm), and basic electrolyzed water (BEW; pH 10 to 13; ORP -800 to -900 mV). By the use of AEW, vegetative cells of various bacteria in suspension were generally reduced by >6.0 log CFU/ml. However, influenced by factors such as surface type and the presence of organic matter, AEW is less effective on utensils/surfaces and food products. Reductions (log units) of bacteria obtained on surfaces/utensil and vegetables/fruits mainly ranged from about 2.0 to 6.0, and 1.0 to 3.5, respectively. Higher reductions were in particular obtained for tomatoes. For chicken carcasses, pork, and fish reductions ranged from about 0.8 to 3.0, 1.0 to 1.8, and 0.4 to 2.8, respectively. Considerable reductions yielded the use of AEW on eggs. On some food commodities, treatment with BEW followed by AEW showed stronger activity than treatment with AEW only. The EW technology deserves consideration in discussing possibilities for the industrial sanitizing of equipments and the decontamination of food products. Nevertheless, decontamination treatments for food products should always be seen as a part of an integral food safety system. Such treatments cannot replace strict adherence to good manufacturing and hygiene practices.

Abstract

Electrolyzed water (EW) is gaining popularity as a sanitizer in the food industries of many countries. By electrolysis a dilute sodium chloride solution dissociates into acidic electrolyzed water (AEW; pH 2 to 3; oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) >1100 mV; active chlorine content 10-90 ppm), and basic electrolyzed water (BEW; pH 10 to 13; ORP -800 to -900 mV). By the use of AEW, vegetative cells of various bacteria in suspension were generally reduced by >6.0 log CFU/ml. However, influenced by factors such as surface type and the presence of organic matter, AEW is less effective on utensils/surfaces and food products. Reductions (log units) of bacteria obtained on surfaces/utensil and vegetables/fruits mainly ranged from about 2.0 to 6.0, and 1.0 to 3.5, respectively. Higher reductions were in particular obtained for tomatoes. For chicken carcasses, pork, and fish reductions ranged from about 0.8 to 3.0, 1.0 to 1.8, and 0.4 to 2.8, respectively. Considerable reductions yielded the use of AEW on eggs. On some food commodities, treatment with BEW followed by AEW showed stronger activity than treatment with AEW only. The EW technology deserves consideration in discussing possibilities for the industrial sanitizing of equipments and the decontamination of food products. Nevertheless, decontamination treatments for food products should always be seen as a part of an integral food safety system. Such treatments cannot replace strict adherence to good manufacturing and hygiene practices.

Statistics

Citations

72 citations in Web of Science®
74 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 25 Nov 2008
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Institute of Food Safety and Hygiene
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2008
Deposited On:25 Nov 2008 11:00
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 12:32
Publisher:International Association for Food Protection
ISSN:0362-028X
PubMed ID:18810883

Download