Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Risky Procurement with an Insider Bidder


Boone, Jan; Chen, Roy; Goeree, Jacob K; Polydoro, Angelo (2009). Risky Procurement with an Insider Bidder. Working paper series / Institute for Empirical Research in Economics No. 433, University of Zurich.

Abstract

Procurement auctions carry substantial risk when the value of the project is highly uncertain and known only to insiders. This paper reports the results from a series of experiments comparing the performance of three auction formats in such complex and risky settings. In the experiment, every bidder knows the private value for the project but only a single insider bidder knows the common-value part. In addition to the standard second-price and English auctions we test the 'qualifying auction', a two-stage format commonly used in the sale of complex and risky assets. The qualifying auction has a fully 'revealing' equilibrium that implements the revenue-maximizing outcome but it also has an uninformative 'babbling' equilibrium in which bidders place arbitrarily high bids in the first stage. In the experiments, the latter equilibrium has more drawing power, which causes the qualifying auction to perform worse than the English auction and only slightly better than a sealed-bid second-price auction. Compared to the two other formats, the English auction is roughly 40% more efficient, yields 50% more revenues, avoids windfall profits for the insider, while protecting uninformed bidders from losses.

Abstract

Procurement auctions carry substantial risk when the value of the project is highly uncertain and known only to insiders. This paper reports the results from a series of experiments comparing the performance of three auction formats in such complex and risky settings. In the experiment, every bidder knows the private value for the project but only a single insider bidder knows the common-value part. In addition to the standard second-price and English auctions we test the 'qualifying auction', a two-stage format commonly used in the sale of complex and risky assets. The qualifying auction has a fully 'revealing' equilibrium that implements the revenue-maximizing outcome but it also has an uninformative 'babbling' equilibrium in which bidders place arbitrarily high bids in the first stage. In the experiments, the latter equilibrium has more drawing power, which causes the qualifying auction to perform worse than the English auction and only slightly better than a sealed-bid second-price auction. Compared to the two other formats, the English auction is roughly 40% more efficient, yields 50% more revenues, avoids windfall profits for the insider, while protecting uninformed bidders from losses.

Statistics

Citations

8 citations in Microsoft Academic

Downloads

426 downloads since deposited on 29 Nov 2011
4 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Working Paper
Communities & Collections:03 Faculty of Economics > Department of Economics
Working Paper Series > Institute for Empirical Research in Economics (former)
Dewey Decimal Classification:330 Economics
Language:English
Date:September 2009
Deposited On:29 Nov 2011 20:09
Last Modified:18 Feb 2018 00:55
Series Name:Working paper series / Institute for Empirical Research in Economics
ISSN:1424-0459
OA Status:Green
Official URL:http://www.econ.uzh.ch/wp.html

Download

Download PDF  'Risky Procurement with an Insider Bidder'.
Preview
Filetype: PDF
Size: 534kB