Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

All clear? Meerkats attend to contextual information in close calls to coordinate vigilance


Townsend, S W; Zöttl, M; Manser, M B (2011). All clear? Meerkats attend to contextual information in close calls to coordinate vigilance. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(10):1927-1934.

Abstract

Socio-demographic factors, such as group size, and their effect on predation vulnerability, have, in addition to intrinsic factors, dominated as explanations when attempting to understand animal vigilance behaviour. It is generally assumed that animals evaluate these external factors visually, however many socially foraging species adopt a foraging technique that directly compromises the visual system. In these instances, such species may instead rely more on the acoustical medium to assess their relative risk and guide their subsequent anti-predator behaviour. We addressed this question in the socially foraging meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Meerkats forage with their head down, but at the same time frequently produce close calls (“Foraging” close calls). Close calls are also produced just after an individual has briefly scanned the surrounding environment for predators (“Guarding” close calls). Here, we firstly show that these Guarding and Foraging close call variants are in fact acoustically distinct and secondly subjects are less vigilant (in terms of frequency and time) when exposed to Guarding close call playbacks than when they hear Foraging close calls. We argue that this is the first evidence for socially foraging animals using the information encoded within calls, the main adaptive function of which is unrelated to immediate predator encounters, to coordinate their vigilance behaviour. In addition these results provide new insights into the potential cognitive mechanisms underlying anti-predator behaviour and suggest meerkats may be capable of signalling to group members the “absence” of predatory threat. If we are to fully understand the complexities underlying the coordination of animal anti-predator behaviour we encourage future studies to take these additional auditory and cognitive dimensions into account.

Abstract

Socio-demographic factors, such as group size, and their effect on predation vulnerability, have, in addition to intrinsic factors, dominated as explanations when attempting to understand animal vigilance behaviour. It is generally assumed that animals evaluate these external factors visually, however many socially foraging species adopt a foraging technique that directly compromises the visual system. In these instances, such species may instead rely more on the acoustical medium to assess their relative risk and guide their subsequent anti-predator behaviour. We addressed this question in the socially foraging meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Meerkats forage with their head down, but at the same time frequently produce close calls (“Foraging” close calls). Close calls are also produced just after an individual has briefly scanned the surrounding environment for predators (“Guarding” close calls). Here, we firstly show that these Guarding and Foraging close call variants are in fact acoustically distinct and secondly subjects are less vigilant (in terms of frequency and time) when exposed to Guarding close call playbacks than when they hear Foraging close calls. We argue that this is the first evidence for socially foraging animals using the information encoded within calls, the main adaptive function of which is unrelated to immediate predator encounters, to coordinate their vigilance behaviour. In addition these results provide new insights into the potential cognitive mechanisms underlying anti-predator behaviour and suggest meerkats may be capable of signalling to group members the “absence” of predatory threat. If we are to fully understand the complexities underlying the coordination of animal anti-predator behaviour we encourage future studies to take these additional auditory and cognitive dimensions into account.

Statistics

Citations

25 citations in Web of Science®
25 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

167 downloads since deposited on 27 Jan 2012
30 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
590 Animals (Zoology)
Language:English
Date:September 2011
Deposited On:27 Jan 2012 09:12
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 15:20
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0340-5443
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1202-6

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Preview
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 105kB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations