Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Closed suction drainage with or without re-transfusion of filtered shed blood does not offer advantages in primary non-cemented total hip replacement using a direct anterior approach.


Kleinert, K; Werner, C M L; Mamisch-Saupe, N; Kalberer, F; Dora, C (2012). Closed suction drainage with or without re-transfusion of filtered shed blood does not offer advantages in primary non-cemented total hip replacement using a direct anterior approach. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 132(1):131-136.

Abstract

The possibility to re-transfuse drained blood was not an argument for using drains and, accepting more thigh swelling, we stop to use drains in simple non-cemented primary THR using the direct anterior approach.

Abstract

The possibility to re-transfuse drained blood was not an argument for using drains and, accepting more thigh swelling, we stop to use drains in simple non-cemented primary THR using the direct anterior approach.

Statistics

Citations

13 citations in Web of Science®
17 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Contributors:Department of Orthopaedics, University of Zurich, Balgrist Hospital, Department of Radiology, University of Zurich, Balgrist Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Kantonsspital Winterthur
Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Department of Trauma Surgery
04 Faculty of Medicine > Balgrist University Hospital, Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Date:2012
Deposited On:30 Jan 2012 09:52
Last Modified:07 Dec 2017 11:30
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0936-8051
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1387-1
PubMed ID:21874574

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher