Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

A cost-benefit analysis of public and private communication


Römer, H; Lang, A; Pfeiffer, M; Hartbauer, M (2011). A cost-benefit analysis of public and private communication. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 4(1):106-108.

Abstract

Understanding the diversity of animal signals requires knowledge of factors which may influence the different stages of communication, from the production of a signal by the sender up to the detection, identification and final decision-making in the receiver. We studied a Neotropical katydid (Docidocercus gigliotosi) which uses airborne sound for long distance communication, but also an alternative form of private signalling through substrate vibration. Males spend more time with private signalling under full moon conditions, when the nocturnal rainforest favours predation by visually hunting predators. For either type of signal we measured the energetic costs of producing it, its active space, and the background noise levels in both transmission channels. Signal perception was studied using neurophysiological methods under outdoor conditions, which is more reliable for the private mode of communication. Our results demonstrate the complex effects of ecological conditions, such as predation, nocturnal ambient light levels and masking noise on the performance of receivers in detecting mating signals, affecting the net advantage or disadvantage of either mode of communication.

Abstract

Understanding the diversity of animal signals requires knowledge of factors which may influence the different stages of communication, from the production of a signal by the sender up to the detection, identification and final decision-making in the receiver. We studied a Neotropical katydid (Docidocercus gigliotosi) which uses airborne sound for long distance communication, but also an alternative form of private signalling through substrate vibration. Males spend more time with private signalling under full moon conditions, when the nocturnal rainforest favours predation by visually hunting predators. For either type of signal we measured the energetic costs of producing it, its active space, and the background noise levels in both transmission channels. Signal perception was studied using neurophysiological methods under outdoor conditions, which is more reliable for the private mode of communication. Our results demonstrate the complex effects of ecological conditions, such as predation, nocturnal ambient light levels and masking noise on the performance of receivers in detecting mating signals, affecting the net advantage or disadvantage of either mode of communication.

Statistics

Altmetrics

Downloads

81 downloads since deposited on 12 Mar 2012
20 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Neuroinformatics
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
Uncontrolled Keywords:Communication;Predation;Transmission channel;Sensory coding;Habitat noise
Language:English
Date:1 January 2011
Deposited On:12 Mar 2012 12:05
Last Modified:07 Dec 2017 13:15
Publisher:Landes Bioscience
ISSN:1942-0889
Free access at:PubMed ID. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.4.1.14173
PubMed ID:21509196

Download

Download PDF  'A cost-benefit analysis of public and private communication'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 231kB
View at publisher