Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Frame construction and frame promotion (Strategic Framing Choices)


Hänggli, R; Kriesi, H (2012). Frame construction and frame promotion (Strategic Framing Choices). American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3):260-278.

Abstract

In this article, the authors discuss the three most important strategic framing choices by political actors (“substantive emphasis choice,” “oppositional emphasis choice,” and “contest emphasis choice”) of direct-democratic campaigns. The authors investigate these strategic framing choices in the media input and look at how the political actors change their choices in another communication channel (political advertisement) and over time. The results provide the following insights: First, political actors tend to emphasize one to two main frames in their media input. They generally also use their main frames in the political advertisements and stay on their main frames over time. Second, although political actors tend to emphasize their own frames, they do not exclusively revert to this behavior. The authors find that the political actors pay more attention to their opponents’ frames in the media input than in the ads. With regard to variation over time, the authors can state that campaign dialogue does not disappear over the course of the campaign. Third, framing is primarily accomplished in substantive terms. In the advertisements and toward the end of the campaign, the authors do not find more contest frames.

Abstract

In this article, the authors discuss the three most important strategic framing choices by political actors (“substantive emphasis choice,” “oppositional emphasis choice,” and “contest emphasis choice”) of direct-democratic campaigns. The authors investigate these strategic framing choices in the media input and look at how the political actors change their choices in another communication channel (political advertisement) and over time. The results provide the following insights: First, political actors tend to emphasize one to two main frames in their media input. They generally also use their main frames in the political advertisements and stay on their main frames over time. Second, although political actors tend to emphasize their own frames, they do not exclusively revert to this behavior. The authors find that the political actors pay more attention to their opponents’ frames in the media input than in the ads. With regard to variation over time, the authors can state that campaign dialogue does not disappear over the course of the campaign. Third, framing is primarily accomplished in substantive terms. In the advertisements and toward the end of the campaign, the authors do not find more contest frames.

Statistics

Citations

18 citations in Web of Science®
25 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

0 downloads since deposited on 16 Apr 2012
37 downloads since 12 months

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science
Dewey Decimal Classification:320 Political science
Uncontrolled Keywords:frame construction, frame building, frame promotion, strategic framing
Language:English
Date:March 2012
Deposited On:16 Apr 2012 07:34
Last Modified:07 Dec 2017 13:37
Publisher:Sage Publications
ISSN:0002-7642
Additional Information:Special Issue Title: Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426325
Related URLs:http://abs.sagepub.com/

Download

Download PDF  'Frame construction and frame promotion (Strategic Framing Choices)'.
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 583kB
View at publisher