Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Pressure indices in peripheral arterial disease assessed by infrared photosensors


Emler, Charlotte; Jacomella, Vincenzo; Rufibach, Kaspar; Thalhammer, Christoph; Amann-Vesti, Beatrice R; Husmann, Marc (2013). Pressure indices in peripheral arterial disease assessed by infrared photosensors. Angiology, 64(2):93-97.

Abstract

Ankle-brachial index (ABI) assessment by Doppler is operator dependent and limited in calcified arteries. For the detection of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), we evaluated ABI and toe-finger (ToFi) pressures by infrared (IR) sensors at the digits and compared with standard Doppler (Doppler-ABI) in 100 patients with PAD and in 15 controls. Pressure indices were obtained in 86% for Doppler-ABI, 82% for IR-ABI, and 94% for IR-ToFi (P < .01). According to Bland-Altmann analysis, IR-ABI and Doppler-ABI are exchangeable (limits of agreement [loa] -0.30; 0.30, bias -0.003, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.02; 0.02), whereas IR-ToFi was not (loa -0.23; 0.61, bias of 0.2, 95% CI 0.16; 0.23). The IR-ToFi revealed the best inter- and intrarater agreement (0.92/0.98) followed by IR-ABI (0.74/0.98) and Doppler-ABI (0.66/0.89). Ankle-brachial arterial pressure index can be assessed by IR photosensors. Although toe-finger index is not exchangeable with standard Doppler, it will need further exploration to define its value for the diagnosis of PAD due to its excellent inter- and intrarater agreement.

Abstract

Ankle-brachial index (ABI) assessment by Doppler is operator dependent and limited in calcified arteries. For the detection of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), we evaluated ABI and toe-finger (ToFi) pressures by infrared (IR) sensors at the digits and compared with standard Doppler (Doppler-ABI) in 100 patients with PAD and in 15 controls. Pressure indices were obtained in 86% for Doppler-ABI, 82% for IR-ABI, and 94% for IR-ToFi (P < .01). According to Bland-Altmann analysis, IR-ABI and Doppler-ABI are exchangeable (limits of agreement [loa] -0.30; 0.30, bias -0.003, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.02; 0.02), whereas IR-ToFi was not (loa -0.23; 0.61, bias of 0.2, 95% CI 0.16; 0.23). The IR-ToFi revealed the best inter- and intrarater agreement (0.92/0.98) followed by IR-ABI (0.74/0.98) and Doppler-ABI (0.66/0.89). Ankle-brachial arterial pressure index can be assessed by IR photosensors. Although toe-finger index is not exchangeable with standard Doppler, it will need further exploration to define its value for the diagnosis of PAD due to its excellent inter- and intrarater agreement.

Statistics

Citations

1 citation in Web of Science®
1 citation in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

94 downloads since deposited on 17 Jan 2013
10 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Angiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI)
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2013
Deposited On:17 Jan 2013 10:20
Last Modified:07 Dec 2017 14:36
Publisher:Angiology
ISSN:1940-1574
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0003319712448248
PubMed ID:22649111

Download

Download PDF  'Pressure indices in peripheral arterial disease assessed by infrared photosensors'.
Preview
Filetype: PDF
Size: 72kB