Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Assessment of cartilage changes over time in knee osteoarthritis dmoad trials using semi-quantitative and quantitative methods: Pros and cons


Wildi, Lukas Martin; Martel-Pelletier, Johanne; Abram, François; Moser, Thomas; Raynauld, Jean-Pierre; Pelletier, Jean-Pierre (2013). Assessment of cartilage changes over time in knee osteoarthritis dmoad trials using semi-quantitative and quantitative methods: Pros and cons. Arthritis Care & Research, 65(5):686-694.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of two MRI sequences on cartilage defect assessment in knee OA patients and the sensitivity to change over time comparing cartilage defect (semi-quantitative) with cartilage volume loss (quantitative) methods. METHODS: GRE and IW-FSE sequences were compared. Knee OA MRI were from two 2-year studies (cohort 1, n=55; cohort 2, n=143). For both cohorts, a GRE sequence was used and patients of cohort 1 underwent an additional IW-FSE. Cohort 2 included patients from a previous trial. Cartilage defects and cartilage volume were evaluated. RESULTS: The cartilage defect assessment provided consistent significantly higher scores in IW-FSE than in GRE sequences at baseline and 2 years. However, there was no difference in the change at 2 years between the sequences. SRM for change did not show difference between the two sequences but was consistently higher (2-2.5 fold) for the quantitative method. Cartilage defect score change between two treatment groups revealed a trend toward significance only in the medial tibial plateau, whereas the change in cartilage volume loss demonstrated significant difference in global knee, femur, lateral femur, and lateral compartment. SRM for the treatment groups combined were markedly higher for cartilage volume loss than for defect by 4.3 to 6.0. CONCLUSION: The direct comparison between GRE and IW-FSE sequences did not suggest superior sensitivity to cartilage defect change over time of one sequence over the other. Interestingly, the quantitative cartilage volume assessment was more sensitive than the semi-quantitative scoring in the detection of treatment effect on OA cartilage changes. © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of two MRI sequences on cartilage defect assessment in knee OA patients and the sensitivity to change over time comparing cartilage defect (semi-quantitative) with cartilage volume loss (quantitative) methods. METHODS: GRE and IW-FSE sequences were compared. Knee OA MRI were from two 2-year studies (cohort 1, n=55; cohort 2, n=143). For both cohorts, a GRE sequence was used and patients of cohort 1 underwent an additional IW-FSE. Cohort 2 included patients from a previous trial. Cartilage defects and cartilage volume were evaluated. RESULTS: The cartilage defect assessment provided consistent significantly higher scores in IW-FSE than in GRE sequences at baseline and 2 years. However, there was no difference in the change at 2 years between the sequences. SRM for change did not show difference between the two sequences but was consistently higher (2-2.5 fold) for the quantitative method. Cartilage defect score change between two treatment groups revealed a trend toward significance only in the medial tibial plateau, whereas the change in cartilage volume loss demonstrated significant difference in global knee, femur, lateral femur, and lateral compartment. SRM for the treatment groups combined were markedly higher for cartilage volume loss than for defect by 4.3 to 6.0. CONCLUSION: The direct comparison between GRE and IW-FSE sequences did not suggest superior sensitivity to cartilage defect change over time of one sequence over the other. Interestingly, the quantitative cartilage volume assessment was more sensitive than the semi-quantitative scoring in the detection of treatment effect on OA cartilage changes. © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Statistics

Citations

16 citations in Web of Science®
17 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Rheumatology Clinic and Institute of Physical Medicine
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2013
Deposited On:14 Dec 2012 09:58
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 16:10
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:2151-464X
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21890
PubMed ID:23139244

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations