Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Zwangsverheiratung im sozialwissenschaftlichen und öffentlich-politischen Diskurs


Goisauf, Melanie; Latcheva, Rossalina (2012). Zwangsverheiratung im sozialwissenschaftlichen und öffentlich-politischen Diskurs. Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs, 1:81-88.

Abstract

In recent years, forced marriage increasingly became a focus of attention in public, political and scientific discourses especially with regard to migration processes and the integration of specific migrant communities. Forced marriage is regarded as a form of domestic violence and a human rights violation. This paper scrutinises popular understandings and common scientific definitions of forced marriage by locating it at the intersection of various forms of social inequality in the context of violence and migration. Based on the analysis of narrations of victims and experts, the study identifies traditionalist practices, misinterpretations of religious obligations, socio-economic deprivation, and experiences of discrimination and marginalisation in the context of immigration as the most relevant factors behind forced marriage. We believe that in order to capture the complex interplay of causes and effects of forced marriage one needs a multifaceted approach which 1) questions the existing public and political discourses on e.g. the so called ‘harmful traditional practices’, 2) evaluates the existing intervention and prevention measures, the legal instruments and their implementation (e.g. the Austrian violence protection act or the international trend to raise age limits for marriages with non-European citizens) and 3) continually contrasts these with the experiences of victims and the views of experts.

Abstract

In recent years, forced marriage increasingly became a focus of attention in public, political and scientific discourses especially with regard to migration processes and the integration of specific migrant communities. Forced marriage is regarded as a form of domestic violence and a human rights violation. This paper scrutinises popular understandings and common scientific definitions of forced marriage by locating it at the intersection of various forms of social inequality in the context of violence and migration. Based on the analysis of narrations of victims and experts, the study identifies traditionalist practices, misinterpretations of religious obligations, socio-economic deprivation, and experiences of discrimination and marginalisation in the context of immigration as the most relevant factors behind forced marriage. We believe that in order to capture the complex interplay of causes and effects of forced marriage one needs a multifaceted approach which 1) questions the existing public and political discourses on e.g. the so called ‘harmful traditional practices’, 2) evaluates the existing intervention and prevention measures, the legal instruments and their implementation (e.g. the Austrian violence protection act or the international trend to raise age limits for marriages with non-European citizens) and 3) continually contrasts these with the experiences of victims and the views of experts.

Statistics

Altmetrics

Downloads

5 downloads since deposited on 08 Jan 2013
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Other titles:Forced marriage in the scientific, political and public discourse
Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Sociology
Dewey Decimal Classification:300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
Uncontrolled Keywords:forced marriage – domestic violence – harmful traditional practices – migration - Vienna
Language:German
Date:2012
Deposited On:08 Jan 2013 12:57
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 16:12
Publisher:ÖAW
ISSN:2221-8890
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1553/BRGOE2012-1s81

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Content: Published Version
Language: German
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 206kB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations