Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Joint analysis of gravitational lensing, clustering, and abundance: Toward the unification of large-scale structure analysis


Yoo, Jaiyul; Seljak, Uroš (2012). Joint analysis of gravitational lensing, clustering, and abundance: Toward the unification of large-scale structure analysis. Physical Review D (Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology), 86:083504.

Abstract

We explore three different methods based on weak lensing to extract cosmological constraints from the large-scale structure. In the first approach [method I: U. Seljak , Phys. Rev. D 71, 103515 (2005)PRVDAQ1550-7998], small-scale galaxy or cluster lensing measurements of their halo mass provide a constraint on the halo bias, which can be combined with the large-scale galaxy or cluster clustering to measure the dark matter clustering. In the second approach [method II: T. Baldauf , Phys. Rev. D 81, 063531 (2010)PRVDAQ1550-7998], large-scale galaxy clustering and large-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing each trace the large-scale dark matter clustering, and the two can be combined into a direct measurement of the dark matter clustering. These two methods can be combined into one method I+II to make use of lensing measurements on all scales. In the third approach (method III), we add abundance information to the method I, which is a version of self-calibrated cluster abundance method. We explore the statistical power of these three approaches as a function of galaxy or cluster luminosity to investigate the optimal mass range for each method and their cosmological constraining power. In the case of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we find that the three methods give comparable constraints, but not in the same mass range: the method II works best for halos of M˜1013Msun, typical of luminous red galaxies, and the methods I and III work best for halos of M˜1014Msun, typical of low-mass clusters. We discuss the robustness of each method against various systematics. Furthermore, we extend the analysis to the future large-scale galaxy surveys and find that the cluster abundance method is not superior to the combined method I+II, both in terms of statistical power and robustness against systematic errors. The cosmic shear-shear correlation analysis in the future surveys yields constraints as strong as the combined method, but suffer from additional systematic effects. We thus advocate the combined analysis of clustering and lensing (method I+II) as a powerful alternative to other large-scale probes. Our analysis provides a guidance to observers planning large-scale galaxy surveys such as the DES, Euclid, and the LSST.

Abstract

We explore three different methods based on weak lensing to extract cosmological constraints from the large-scale structure. In the first approach [method I: U. Seljak , Phys. Rev. D 71, 103515 (2005)PRVDAQ1550-7998], small-scale galaxy or cluster lensing measurements of their halo mass provide a constraint on the halo bias, which can be combined with the large-scale galaxy or cluster clustering to measure the dark matter clustering. In the second approach [method II: T. Baldauf , Phys. Rev. D 81, 063531 (2010)PRVDAQ1550-7998], large-scale galaxy clustering and large-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing each trace the large-scale dark matter clustering, and the two can be combined into a direct measurement of the dark matter clustering. These two methods can be combined into one method I+II to make use of lensing measurements on all scales. In the third approach (method III), we add abundance information to the method I, which is a version of self-calibrated cluster abundance method. We explore the statistical power of these three approaches as a function of galaxy or cluster luminosity to investigate the optimal mass range for each method and their cosmological constraining power. In the case of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we find that the three methods give comparable constraints, but not in the same mass range: the method II works best for halos of M˜1013Msun, typical of luminous red galaxies, and the methods I and III work best for halos of M˜1014Msun, typical of low-mass clusters. We discuss the robustness of each method against various systematics. Furthermore, we extend the analysis to the future large-scale galaxy surveys and find that the cluster abundance method is not superior to the combined method I+II, both in terms of statistical power and robustness against systematic errors. The cosmic shear-shear correlation analysis in the future surveys yields constraints as strong as the combined method, but suffer from additional systematic effects. We thus advocate the combined analysis of clustering and lensing (method I+II) as a powerful alternative to other large-scale probes. Our analysis provides a guidance to observers planning large-scale galaxy surveys such as the DES, Euclid, and the LSST.

Statistics

Citations

15 citations in Web of Science®
13 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

38 downloads since deposited on 05 Mar 2013
7 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute for Computational Science
Dewey Decimal Classification:530 Physics
Language:English
Date:2012
Deposited On:05 Mar 2013 09:58
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 16:17
Publisher:American Physical Society
ISSN:1550-2368
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.083504

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Preview
Filetype: PDF
Size: 767kB
View at publisher