Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Initial apical fit of K-files versus LightSpeed LSX instruments assessed by micro-computed tomography


Marending, M; Schicht, O O; Paqué, F (2012). Initial apical fit of K-files versus LightSpeed LSX instruments assessed by micro-computed tomography. International Endodontic Journal, 45(2):169-176.

Abstract

AIM: To compare the apical fit in two dimensions of the first K-file versus the first Lightspeed LSX instrument binding at working length after an initial crown-down preparation.
METHODOLOGY: Twenty maxillary molars with fully developed roots and four separate root canals were selected. Canals were pre-flared with ProFile.04 taper instruments to three quarters of estimated working length. Working length was electronically determined using a size 06 K-file. Progressively larger K-files were inserted passively to working length. The first binding K-file was termed initial apical file (IAF). Then, the first binding LSX initial apical lightspeed-instrument (IAL) was determined. Teeth were scanned with and without instruments in place using micro-computed tomography. Cross-sections of the apical part of the root canals were analysed as follows: the largest and smallest diameters of the root canal and the diameter of the instrument were calculated and related to each other. Statistics were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon test. The alpha-type error was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: Initial apical file sizes ranged from 8 to 30 and were lowest in second mesiobuccal and highest in palatal canals. IAL sizes ranged from size 20 to 40. The apical large canal diameter was assessed more accurately by the LSX instruments (P < 0.0001). However, the smallest available LSX instrument (i.e. size 20) did not reach working length in 39 of 80 canals. Conclusions: Instruments with a flat widened tip were found to determine apical cross-sectional diameter better than round, tapered instruments.

Abstract

AIM: To compare the apical fit in two dimensions of the first K-file versus the first Lightspeed LSX instrument binding at working length after an initial crown-down preparation.
METHODOLOGY: Twenty maxillary molars with fully developed roots and four separate root canals were selected. Canals were pre-flared with ProFile.04 taper instruments to three quarters of estimated working length. Working length was electronically determined using a size 06 K-file. Progressively larger K-files were inserted passively to working length. The first binding K-file was termed initial apical file (IAF). Then, the first binding LSX initial apical lightspeed-instrument (IAL) was determined. Teeth were scanned with and without instruments in place using micro-computed tomography. Cross-sections of the apical part of the root canals were analysed as follows: the largest and smallest diameters of the root canal and the diameter of the instrument were calculated and related to each other. Statistics were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon test. The alpha-type error was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: Initial apical file sizes ranged from 8 to 30 and were lowest in second mesiobuccal and highest in palatal canals. IAL sizes ranged from size 20 to 40. The apical large canal diameter was assessed more accurately by the LSX instruments (P < 0.0001). However, the smallest available LSX instrument (i.e. size 20) did not reach working length in 39 of 80 canals. Conclusions: Instruments with a flat widened tip were found to determine apical cross-sectional diameter better than round, tapered instruments.

Statistics

Citations

3 citations in Web of Science®
4 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 28 Jan 2013
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2012
Deposited On:28 Jan 2013 08:01
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 16:20
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:0143-2885
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01967.x
PubMed ID:21992481

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 1MB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations