Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Successful Aging


Freund, Alexandra M; Nikitin, Jana; Riediger, Michaela (2012). Successful Aging. In: Lerner, R M; Easterbrooks, M A; Mistry, J. Handbook of psychology, Vol. 6. Developmental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 615-638.

Abstract

Historically, life expectancy has only recently extended into old age and has dramatically increased over the past 100 years. Early accounts of aging have characterized this phase in life as one of more or less uniform decline and focused on the question how people can react to and cope with the many losses they encounter. Although this question remains one of the topics of aging research, more recent approaches to the notion of “successful aging” also address the question of how older adults proactively shape their own aging process. In this chapter, we review the state of research on the topic of successful aging. Early approaches focused on the question “what is successful aging?” by outlining general criteria for aging well. More recent approaches have shifted the focus to the question “how do people age successfully?” These models—socioemotional selectivity theory (Carstensen, 2006; Carstensen, Isaacowitz, & Charles, 1999), the model of selection, optimization, and compensation (P. Baltes & Baltes, 1990; Freund, 2008), the model of assimilative and accommodative coping (Brandstädter & Renner, 1990), or the model of primary and secondary control (Heckhausen & Schulz, 1995; Heckhausen, Wrosch, & Schulz, 2010)—emphasize the role of proactive emotional and motivational processes for aging successfully. By setting goals in accordance with one's resources as well as age-related concerns (e.g., prioritizing emotional goals over the acquisition of information), by adapting goals and standards to the changing availability of resources (e.g., to health-related decline), and by disengaging from unavailable goals, older people can maintain high levels of functioning and subjective well-being. Hopefully, the identification of processes underlying successful aging will help to enhance the quality of older persons' lives in the future.

Abstract

Historically, life expectancy has only recently extended into old age and has dramatically increased over the past 100 years. Early accounts of aging have characterized this phase in life as one of more or less uniform decline and focused on the question how people can react to and cope with the many losses they encounter. Although this question remains one of the topics of aging research, more recent approaches to the notion of “successful aging” also address the question of how older adults proactively shape their own aging process. In this chapter, we review the state of research on the topic of successful aging. Early approaches focused on the question “what is successful aging?” by outlining general criteria for aging well. More recent approaches have shifted the focus to the question “how do people age successfully?” These models—socioemotional selectivity theory (Carstensen, 2006; Carstensen, Isaacowitz, & Charles, 1999), the model of selection, optimization, and compensation (P. Baltes & Baltes, 1990; Freund, 2008), the model of assimilative and accommodative coping (Brandstädter & Renner, 1990), or the model of primary and secondary control (Heckhausen & Schulz, 1995; Heckhausen, Wrosch, & Schulz, 2010)—emphasize the role of proactive emotional and motivational processes for aging successfully. By setting goals in accordance with one's resources as well as age-related concerns (e.g., prioritizing emotional goals over the acquisition of information), by adapting goals and standards to the changing availability of resources (e.g., to health-related decline), and by disengaging from unavailable goals, older people can maintain high levels of functioning and subjective well-being. Hopefully, the identification of processes underlying successful aging will help to enhance the quality of older persons' lives in the future.

Statistics

Citations

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Book Section, refereed, further contribution
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Language:English
Date:2012
Deposited On:13 Feb 2013 14:32
Last Modified:07 Dec 2017 18:57
Publisher:John Wiley & Sons
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop206025

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher