Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

How to use an article reporting a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis


Mills, Edward J; Ioannidis, John P A; Thorlund, Kristian; Schünemann, Holger J; Puhan, Milo A; Guyatt, Gordon H (2012). How to use an article reporting a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis. JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association, 308(12):1246-1253.

Abstract

Multiple treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis uses both direct (head-to-head) randomized clinical trial (RCT) evidence as well as indirect evidence from RCTs to compare the relative effectiveness of all included interventions. The methodological quality of MTCs may be difficult for clinicians to interpret because the number of interventions evaluated may be large and the methodological approaches may be complex. Clinicians and others evaluating an MTC should be aware of the potential biases that can affect the interpretation of these analyses. Readers should consider whether the primary studies are sufficiently homogeneous to combine; whether the different interventions are sufficiently similar in their populations, study designs, and outcomes; and whether the direct evidence is sufficiently similar to the indirect evidence to consider combining. This article uses the existing Users' Guides format to address study validity, interpretation of results, and application to a patient scenario.

Abstract

Multiple treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis uses both direct (head-to-head) randomized clinical trial (RCT) evidence as well as indirect evidence from RCTs to compare the relative effectiveness of all included interventions. The methodological quality of MTCs may be difficult for clinicians to interpret because the number of interventions evaluated may be large and the methodological approaches may be complex. Clinicians and others evaluating an MTC should be aware of the potential biases that can affect the interpretation of these analyses. Readers should consider whether the primary studies are sufficiently homogeneous to combine; whether the different interventions are sufficiently similar in their populations, study designs, and outcomes; and whether the direct evidence is sufficiently similar to the indirect evidence to consider combining. This article uses the existing Users' Guides format to address study validity, interpretation of results, and application to a patient scenario.

Statistics

Citations

131 citations in Web of Science®
136 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 12 Mar 2013
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic and Policlinic for Internal Medicine
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2012
Deposited On:12 Mar 2013 14:22
Last Modified:07 Dec 2017 20:06
Publisher:American Medical Association (AMA)
ISSN:0098-7484
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.11228
PubMed ID:23011714

Download