Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Shared decision making and advance care planning-underpinnings, similarities and differences


Krones, Tanja; Biller Andorno, Nikola; in der Schmitten, J; Mitchell, C; Spirig, R; Zaugg, K (2012). Shared decision making and advance care planning-underpinnings, similarities and differences. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2(2):173.

Abstract

There are two movements, each rooted in bioethics and evidence-based medicine, that focus on quite similar aims yet are not fully aligned and integrated in the clinical care of dying patients: The first, “advance care planning” focusses on future decisions when one becomes incapable of decision making, and the second, “shared decision making” has led to decision aids designed on the basis of empirical evidence to solicit and support patients' choices and decisions. The aim of our study, beginning in 2012, is to develop, implement and test a complex intervention (continuous multi-professional development – CPD program) for improving patients' preparation for and participation in end of life decisions including both strategies ACP and SDM/DA on end of life issues in an acute care hospital setting. In order to prepare for our randomised controlled trial, we systematically screened existing ACP and SDM programs for end of life issues and analysed their content, scope, aims, similarities and differences. The SDM philosophy relies more on giving tailored statistical information on distinct measures whereas ACP relies more on defining broader goals of care, which might indicate not only different contents but also differing concepts of autonomy. Outcomes are both similar and different. For example, both investigate impact on satisfaction with care and economy. SDM focuses more on knowledge and decisional conflict whereas ACP focuses on numbers of advance directives (ADs), and decisions made according to wishes. We will discuss philosophical and practical underpinnings of bringing the two movements together.

Abstract

There are two movements, each rooted in bioethics and evidence-based medicine, that focus on quite similar aims yet are not fully aligned and integrated in the clinical care of dying patients: The first, “advance care planning” focusses on future decisions when one becomes incapable of decision making, and the second, “shared decision making” has led to decision aids designed on the basis of empirical evidence to solicit and support patients' choices and decisions. The aim of our study, beginning in 2012, is to develop, implement and test a complex intervention (continuous multi-professional development – CPD program) for improving patients' preparation for and participation in end of life decisions including both strategies ACP and SDM/DA on end of life issues in an acute care hospital setting. In order to prepare for our randomised controlled trial, we systematically screened existing ACP and SDM programs for end of life issues and analysed their content, scope, aims, similarities and differences. The SDM philosophy relies more on giving tailored statistical information on distinct measures whereas ACP relies more on defining broader goals of care, which might indicate not only different contents but also differing concepts of autonomy. Outcomes are both similar and different. For example, both investigate impact on satisfaction with care and economy. SDM focuses more on knowledge and decisional conflict whereas ACP focuses on numbers of advance directives (ADs), and decisions made according to wishes. We will discuss philosophical and practical underpinnings of bringing the two movements together.

Statistics

Altmetrics

Downloads

6 downloads since deposited on 28 Feb 2013
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, further contribution
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2012
Deposited On:28 Feb 2013 12:43
Last Modified:21 Nov 2017 16:34
Publisher:B M J Group
ISSN:2045-435X
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000250.10

Download