Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Physiological and biochemical basis of clinical liver function tests: a review


Hoekstra, Lisette T; de Graaf, Wilmar; Nibourg, Geert A A; Heger, Michal; Bennink, Roelof J; Stieger, Bruno; van Gulik, Thomas M (2013). Physiological and biochemical basis of clinical liver function tests: a review. Annals of Surgery, 257(1):27-36.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the most clinically relevant and novel liver function tests used for the assessment of hepatic function before liver surgery.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative liver failure is the major cause of mortality and morbidity after partial liver resection and develops as a result of insufficient remnant liver function. Therefore, accurate preoperative assessment of the future remnant liver function is mandatory in the selection of candidates for safe partial liver resection.
METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed using the key words "liver function tests," "functional studies in the liver," "compromised liver," "physiological basis," and "mechanistic background," with and without Boolean operators.
RESULTS: Passive liver function tests, including biochemical parameters and clinical grading systems, are not accurate enough in predicting outcome after liver surgery. Dynamic quantitative liver function tests, such as the indocyanine green test and galactose elimination capacity, are more accurate as they measure the elimination process of a substance that is cleared and/or metabolized almost exclusively by the liver. However, these tests only measure global liver function. Nuclear imaging techniques ((99m)Tc-galactosyl serum albumin scintigraphy and (99m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy) can measure both total and future remnant liver function and potentially identify patients at risk for postresectional liver failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of the complexity of liver function, one single test does not represent overall liver function. In addition to computed tomography volumetry, quantitative liver function tests should be used to determine whether a safe resection can be performed. Presently, (99m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy seems to be the most valuable quantitative liver function test, as it can measure multiple aspects of liver function in, specifically, the future remnant liver.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the most clinically relevant and novel liver function tests used for the assessment of hepatic function before liver surgery.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative liver failure is the major cause of mortality and morbidity after partial liver resection and develops as a result of insufficient remnant liver function. Therefore, accurate preoperative assessment of the future remnant liver function is mandatory in the selection of candidates for safe partial liver resection.
METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed using the key words "liver function tests," "functional studies in the liver," "compromised liver," "physiological basis," and "mechanistic background," with and without Boolean operators.
RESULTS: Passive liver function tests, including biochemical parameters and clinical grading systems, are not accurate enough in predicting outcome after liver surgery. Dynamic quantitative liver function tests, such as the indocyanine green test and galactose elimination capacity, are more accurate as they measure the elimination process of a substance that is cleared and/or metabolized almost exclusively by the liver. However, these tests only measure global liver function. Nuclear imaging techniques ((99m)Tc-galactosyl serum albumin scintigraphy and (99m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy) can measure both total and future remnant liver function and potentially identify patients at risk for postresectional liver failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of the complexity of liver function, one single test does not represent overall liver function. In addition to computed tomography volumetry, quantitative liver function tests should be used to determine whether a safe resection can be performed. Presently, (99m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy seems to be the most valuable quantitative liver function test, as it can measure multiple aspects of liver function in, specifically, the future remnant liver.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
91 citations in Web of Science®
103 citations in Scopus®
97 citations in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

162 downloads since deposited on 11 Apr 2013
131 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, further contribution
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2013
Deposited On:11 Apr 2013 09:17
Last Modified:16 Feb 2018 20:43
Publisher:Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
ISSN:0003-4932
Additional Information:This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Hoekstra, Lisette T; de Graaf, Wilmar; Nibourg, Geert A A; Heger, Michal; Bennink, Roelof J; Stieger, Bruno; van Gulik, Thomas M (2013). Physiological and biochemical basis of clinical liver function tests: a review. Annals of Surgery, 257(1):27-36.
OA Status:Green
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825d5d47
PubMed ID:22836216

Download

Download PDF  'Physiological and biochemical basis of clinical liver function tests: a review'.
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 3MB
View at publisher