Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Lack and jouissance in hegemonic discourse of identification with the state


Müller, Martin (2013). Lack and jouissance in hegemonic discourse of identification with the state. Organization, 20(2):279-298.

Abstract

This paper shows how hegemonic discourses are sustained through the play of lack and jouissance. Lack refers to the symbolic limits of discourse and is both the condition of possibility and of impossibility of hegemony: while it vitiates the realization of a full identity, it at the same time keeps spurring the search for it. Jouissance describes the paradoxical satisfaction in dissatisfaction that subjects procure from this lack, from the failure to attain the enjoyment that hegemonic discourse promises. Looking at how organizations become enmeshed with the formation of state subjects, the paper considers identification with the discourse of a strong Russia at a Russian elite university as an empirical illustration. This discourse becomes hegemonic in students’ identification not only because it proposes a comprehensive project that unifies a range of diverse signifiers and promises enjoyment, but also because it fails to provide a full symbolic suture and subjects are unable to obtain the promised enjoyment. This constant lack forms the basis for repeated acts of identification that strive to overcome it and provides a jouissance that keeps subjects attached to the illusory quest for real enjoyment – and thus to identification with a strong Russia.

Abstract

This paper shows how hegemonic discourses are sustained through the play of lack and jouissance. Lack refers to the symbolic limits of discourse and is both the condition of possibility and of impossibility of hegemony: while it vitiates the realization of a full identity, it at the same time keeps spurring the search for it. Jouissance describes the paradoxical satisfaction in dissatisfaction that subjects procure from this lack, from the failure to attain the enjoyment that hegemonic discourse promises. Looking at how organizations become enmeshed with the formation of state subjects, the paper considers identification with the discourse of a strong Russia at a Russian elite university as an empirical illustration. This discourse becomes hegemonic in students’ identification not only because it proposes a comprehensive project that unifies a range of diverse signifiers and promises enjoyment, but also because it fails to provide a full symbolic suture and subjects are unable to obtain the promised enjoyment. This constant lack forms the basis for repeated acts of identification that strive to overcome it and provides a jouissance that keeps subjects attached to the illusory quest for real enjoyment – and thus to identification with a strong Russia.

Statistics

Citations

8 citations in Web of Science®
8 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

7 downloads since deposited on 16 Sep 2013
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography
Dewey Decimal Classification:910 Geography & travel
Language:English
Date:2013
Deposited On:16 Sep 2013 07:12
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 16:50
Publisher:SAGE Publications
ISSN:1461-7323
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412445041
Related URLs:https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/Publikationen/210727
http://org.sagepub.com/content/20/2.toc (Publisher)

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 501kB
View at publisher