Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Varieties of capitalist debates: How institutions shape public conflicts on economic liberalization in the United Kingdom, Germany and France


Wüest, B (2013). Varieties of capitalist debates: How institutions shape public conflicts on economic liberalization in the United Kingdom, Germany and France. Comparative European Politics, 2013(11):752-772.

Abstract

Well-known approaches in comparative institutional analysis like the Varieties of Capitalism typology often do not explicitly consider how institutions are shaping public debates. In doing so, they fall short of grasping the full extent of divergence among advanced economies. By exploring the policy preferences of a broad range of relevant actors including public administrations, parties, interest groups, corporations, experts and transnational governmental actors, this analysis can show how the institutional constellations of the United Kingdom, France and Germany explain a considerable part of the variation in their debates on economic liberalization reforms. The analysis is based on extensive content analysis data from quality newspapers and confirms that national peculiarities in public debates are a function on the particular institutional context. Contrary to intuitive expectations from the literature on comparative political economy, however, the course of debates complements the structure of interest intermediation: In Germany and France, corporatist and state-led concertation is accompanied by comparatively fierce public debates, whereas the conflictive decision-making processes in the United Kingdom go along with rather calm public conflicts. Key to understand this complementarity is the consideration of both political-economic and general democratic institutions, which are conjointly shaping the outcome of debates.

Abstract

Well-known approaches in comparative institutional analysis like the Varieties of Capitalism typology often do not explicitly consider how institutions are shaping public debates. In doing so, they fall short of grasping the full extent of divergence among advanced economies. By exploring the policy preferences of a broad range of relevant actors including public administrations, parties, interest groups, corporations, experts and transnational governmental actors, this analysis can show how the institutional constellations of the United Kingdom, France and Germany explain a considerable part of the variation in their debates on economic liberalization reforms. The analysis is based on extensive content analysis data from quality newspapers and confirms that national peculiarities in public debates are a function on the particular institutional context. Contrary to intuitive expectations from the literature on comparative political economy, however, the course of debates complements the structure of interest intermediation: In Germany and France, corporatist and state-led concertation is accompanied by comparatively fierce public debates, whereas the conflictive decision-making processes in the United Kingdom go along with rather calm public conflicts. Key to understand this complementarity is the consideration of both political-economic and general democratic institutions, which are conjointly shaping the outcome of debates.

Statistics

Citations

2 citations in Web of Science®
2 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 16 Dec 2013
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science
Dewey Decimal Classification:320 Political science
Uncontrolled Keywords:public debates; economic liberalization; comparative institutional analysis; the United Kingdom; Germany; France
Language:English
Date:2013
Deposited On:16 Dec 2013 12:50
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 17:15
Publisher:Palgrave Macmillan
ISSN:1472-4790
Funders:Swiss National Science Foundation
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2012.30

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 359kB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations