Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements


Heinrich, Henriette; Fruehauf, Heiko; Sauter, Matthias; Steingötter, Andreas; Fried, Michael; Schwizer, Werner; Fox, Mark (2013). The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 25(3):230-237.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend instruction and motivation during anorectal manometry; however, its impact on findings has not been reported. This study assessed the effects of standard versus enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on the results of anorectal manometry. METHODS: High-resolution manometry was performed by a solid-state catheter with 10 circumferential sensors at 6 mm separation across the anal canal and two rectal sensors. Measurements were acquired first with standard instruction and then with enhanced instruction and verbal feedback. On both occasions, squeeze pressure and duration during three voluntary contractions and intra-rectal pressure and recto-anal pressure gradient (RAPG) during three attempts at simulated defecation were assessed. KEY RESULTS: A total of 70 consecutive patients (54 female; age 25-82 years) referred for investigation of fecal incontinence (n = 31), constipation, and related disorders of defecation (n = 39) were studied. Enhanced instruction and verbal feedback increased maximum squeeze pressure (Δ10 ± 28.5 mmHg; P < 0.0038) and duration of contraction (Δ3 ± 4 s; P < 0.0001). During simulated defecation, it increased intra-rectal pressure (Δ12 ± 14 mmHg; P < 0.003) and RAPG (Δ11 ± 20 mmHg; P < 0.0001). Using standard diagnostic criteria, the intervention changed manometric findings from locally validated 'pathologic' to 'normal' values in 14/31 patients with incontinence and 12/39 with disorders of defecation. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Enhanced instruction and verbal feedback significantly improved voluntary anorectal functions and resulted in a clinically relevant change of manometric diagnosis in some patients. Effective explanation of procedures and motivation during manometry is required to ensure consistent results and to provide an accurate representation of patient ability to retain continence and evacuate stool.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend instruction and motivation during anorectal manometry; however, its impact on findings has not been reported. This study assessed the effects of standard versus enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on the results of anorectal manometry. METHODS: High-resolution manometry was performed by a solid-state catheter with 10 circumferential sensors at 6 mm separation across the anal canal and two rectal sensors. Measurements were acquired first with standard instruction and then with enhanced instruction and verbal feedback. On both occasions, squeeze pressure and duration during three voluntary contractions and intra-rectal pressure and recto-anal pressure gradient (RAPG) during three attempts at simulated defecation were assessed. KEY RESULTS: A total of 70 consecutive patients (54 female; age 25-82 years) referred for investigation of fecal incontinence (n = 31), constipation, and related disorders of defecation (n = 39) were studied. Enhanced instruction and verbal feedback increased maximum squeeze pressure (Δ10 ± 28.5 mmHg; P < 0.0038) and duration of contraction (Δ3 ± 4 s; P < 0.0001). During simulated defecation, it increased intra-rectal pressure (Δ12 ± 14 mmHg; P < 0.003) and RAPG (Δ11 ± 20 mmHg; P < 0.0001). Using standard diagnostic criteria, the intervention changed manometric findings from locally validated 'pathologic' to 'normal' values in 14/31 patients with incontinence and 12/39 with disorders of defecation. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Enhanced instruction and verbal feedback significantly improved voluntary anorectal functions and resulted in a clinically relevant change of manometric diagnosis in some patients. Effective explanation of procedures and motivation during manometry is required to ensure consistent results and to provide an accurate representation of patient ability to retain continence and evacuate stool.

Statistics

Citations

11 citations in Web of Science®
14 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

55 downloads since deposited on 13 Dec 2013
6 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Contributors:University Hopsital Zurich
Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:March 2013
Deposited On:13 Dec 2013 11:50
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 17:15
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:1350-1925
Funders:Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12038
PubMed ID:23130678

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Preview
Filetype: PDF
Size: 503kB
View at publisher

Article Networks

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations