Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements


Heinrich, Henriette; Fruehauf, Heiko; Sauter, Matthias; Steingötter, Andreas; Fried, Michael; Schwizer, Werner; Fox, Mark (2013). The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 25(3):230-237.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend instruction and motivation during anorectal manometry; however, its impact on findings has not been reported. This study assessed the effects of standard versus enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on the results of anorectal manometry. METHODS: High-resolution manometry was performed by a solid-state catheter with 10 circumferential sensors at 6 mm separation across the anal canal and two rectal sensors. Measurements were acquired first with standard instruction and then with enhanced instruction and verbal feedback. On both occasions, squeeze pressure and duration during three voluntary contractions and intra-rectal pressure and recto-anal pressure gradient (RAPG) during three attempts at simulated defecation were assessed. KEY RESULTS: A total of 70 consecutive patients (54 female; age 25-82 years) referred for investigation of fecal incontinence (n = 31), constipation, and related disorders of defecation (n = 39) were studied. Enhanced instruction and verbal feedback increased maximum squeeze pressure (Δ10 ± 28.5 mmHg; P < 0.0038) and duration of contraction (Δ3 ± 4 s; P < 0.0001). During simulated defecation, it increased intra-rectal pressure (Δ12 ± 14 mmHg; P < 0.003) and RAPG (Δ11 ± 20 mmHg; P < 0.0001). Using standard diagnostic criteria, the intervention changed manometric findings from locally validated 'pathologic' to 'normal' values in 14/31 patients with incontinence and 12/39 with disorders of defecation. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Enhanced instruction and verbal feedback significantly improved voluntary anorectal functions and resulted in a clinically relevant change of manometric diagnosis in some patients. Effective explanation of procedures and motivation during manometry is required to ensure consistent results and to provide an accurate representation of patient ability to retain continence and evacuate stool.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend instruction and motivation during anorectal manometry; however, its impact on findings has not been reported. This study assessed the effects of standard versus enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on the results of anorectal manometry. METHODS: High-resolution manometry was performed by a solid-state catheter with 10 circumferential sensors at 6 mm separation across the anal canal and two rectal sensors. Measurements were acquired first with standard instruction and then with enhanced instruction and verbal feedback. On both occasions, squeeze pressure and duration during three voluntary contractions and intra-rectal pressure and recto-anal pressure gradient (RAPG) during three attempts at simulated defecation were assessed. KEY RESULTS: A total of 70 consecutive patients (54 female; age 25-82 years) referred for investigation of fecal incontinence (n = 31), constipation, and related disorders of defecation (n = 39) were studied. Enhanced instruction and verbal feedback increased maximum squeeze pressure (Δ10 ± 28.5 mmHg; P < 0.0038) and duration of contraction (Δ3 ± 4 s; P < 0.0001). During simulated defecation, it increased intra-rectal pressure (Δ12 ± 14 mmHg; P < 0.003) and RAPG (Δ11 ± 20 mmHg; P < 0.0001). Using standard diagnostic criteria, the intervention changed manometric findings from locally validated 'pathologic' to 'normal' values in 14/31 patients with incontinence and 12/39 with disorders of defecation. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Enhanced instruction and verbal feedback significantly improved voluntary anorectal functions and resulted in a clinically relevant change of manometric diagnosis in some patients. Effective explanation of procedures and motivation during manometry is required to ensure consistent results and to provide an accurate representation of patient ability to retain continence and evacuate stool.

Statistics

Citations

12 citations in Web of Science®
15 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

67 downloads since deposited on 13 Dec 2013
17 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Contributors:University Hopsital Zurich
Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:March 2013
Deposited On:13 Dec 2013 11:50
Last Modified:08 Dec 2017 01:02
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:1350-1925
Funders:Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12038
PubMed ID:23130678

Download

Download PDF  'The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements'.
Preview
Filetype: PDF
Size: 503kB
View at publisher