Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Legitimacy-as-Feeling: How affect leads to vertical legitimacy spillovers in transnational governance


Haack, Patrick; Pfarrer, Michael D; Scherer, Andreas Georg (2014). Legitimacy-as-Feeling: How affect leads to vertical legitimacy spillovers in transnational governance. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4):634-666.

Abstract

Transnational governance schemes (TGSs) are interorganizational networks of public and/or private actors that jointly regulate global public policy issues, such as the prevention of human rights violations and the protection of ecosystems. Considering that TGSs mainly address issues of public concern, the general public represents a major source of legitimacy in transnational governance. We theorize how members of the general public, whom we conceptualize as intuiters, apply heuristics to bestow legitimacy on TGSs. Given the difficulty of assessing TGSs, we argue that intuiters draw on affect-based responses towards a TGS's better-known network affiliates, such as participating business firms, to judge the legitimacy of the TGS as a whole. This substitution produces a “vertical” legitimacy spillover. More specifically, we examine the heuristic process of judgment underlying vertical spillovers in TGSs and derive implications for the legitimacy construct and the analysis of spillover phenomena.

Abstract

Transnational governance schemes (TGSs) are interorganizational networks of public and/or private actors that jointly regulate global public policy issues, such as the prevention of human rights violations and the protection of ecosystems. Considering that TGSs mainly address issues of public concern, the general public represents a major source of legitimacy in transnational governance. We theorize how members of the general public, whom we conceptualize as intuiters, apply heuristics to bestow legitimacy on TGSs. Given the difficulty of assessing TGSs, we argue that intuiters draw on affect-based responses towards a TGS's better-known network affiliates, such as participating business firms, to judge the legitimacy of the TGS as a whole. This substitution produces a “vertical” legitimacy spillover. More specifically, we examine the heuristic process of judgment underlying vertical spillovers in TGSs and derive implications for the legitimacy construct and the analysis of spillover phenomena.

Statistics

Citations

12 citations in Web of Science®
13 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

3 downloads since deposited on 23 Dec 2013
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:03 Faculty of Economics > Department of Business Administration
Dewey Decimal Classification:330 Economics
Language:English
Date:2014
Deposited On:23 Dec 2013 09:38
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 17:18
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN:1467-6486
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12071
Official URL:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joms.12071/abstract
Other Identification Number:merlin-id:8803

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 205kB
View at publisher