Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

An evaluation of web-based geovisualizations for different levels of abstraction and realism – what do users predict?


Boér, Alíz; Coltekin, Arzu; Clarke, Keith C (2013). An evaluation of web-based geovisualizations for different levels of abstraction and realism – what do users predict? In: 26th International Cartographic Conference, Dresden, Germany, 25 August 2013 - 30 August 2013, onine.

Abstract

Web-based geovisualizations are produced and served in various levels of abstraction (or realism) such as two-dimensional (2D) cartographic maps, aerial and satellite maps, shaded relief maps, three-dimensional (3D) objects integrated with 2D base maps, and digital globes with fully textured realistic 3D representations. All of these are necessary; but which one is best fitting for which task? When do we need the highest level of realism, and when can or should we use the highest level of abstraction? To contribute to tackling these large questions, we study a subset of non-expert tasks selected from task taxonomies in literature in relation to a subset of existing geovisualizations by means of two online user studies. In an online survey, users (n=106) responded to a list of tasks, where we ask them to predict which of the visualizations they think they would use for this task (thus we measure perceived preference). In a second survey, we give the users (n=245) a set of tasks to solve using one of the provided visualizations, thus we observe which level of abstraction/realism they will actually use and measure actual preference (choice) as well performance. In this paper, we report the results from the first survey.

Abstract

Web-based geovisualizations are produced and served in various levels of abstraction (or realism) such as two-dimensional (2D) cartographic maps, aerial and satellite maps, shaded relief maps, three-dimensional (3D) objects integrated with 2D base maps, and digital globes with fully textured realistic 3D representations. All of these are necessary; but which one is best fitting for which task? When do we need the highest level of realism, and when can or should we use the highest level of abstraction? To contribute to tackling these large questions, we study a subset of non-expert tasks selected from task taxonomies in literature in relation to a subset of existing geovisualizations by means of two online user studies. In an online survey, users (n=106) responded to a list of tasks, where we ask them to predict which of the visualizations they think they would use for this task (thus we measure perceived preference). In a second survey, we give the users (n=245) a set of tasks to solve using one of the provided visualizations, thus we observe which level of abstraction/realism they will actually use and measure actual preference (choice) as well performance. In this paper, we report the results from the first survey.

Statistics

Altmetrics

Downloads

399 downloads since deposited on 10 Jan 2014
13 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper), not refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography
Dewey Decimal Classification:910 Geography & travel
Language:English
Event End Date:30 August 2013
Deposited On:10 Jan 2014 09:41
Last Modified:08 Dec 2017 01:46
ISBN:978-1-907075-06-3
Official URL:http://www.icc2013.org/_contxt/_medien/_upload/_proceeding/284_proceeding.pdf
Related URLs:http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2013/ICC2013_Proceedings.pdf

Download

Download PDF  'An evaluation of web-based geovisualizations for different levels of abstraction and realism – what do users predict?'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 550kB