Publication:

How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands?

Date

Date

Date
2008
Journal Article
Published version
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-07-03T03:43:09Z
cris.lastimport.wos2025-08-01T01:34:45Z
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-16T15:30:23Z
dc.date.available2009-01-16T15:30:23Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstract

Habitat fragmentation, patch quality and landscape structure are important predictors for species richness. However, conservation strategies targeting single species mainly focus on habitat patches and neglect possible effects of the surrounding landscape. This project assesses the impact of management, habitat fragmentation and landscape structure at different spatial scales on the distribution of three endangered butterfly species, Boloria selene, Boloria titania and Brenthis ino. We selected 36 study sites in the Swiss Alps differing in (1) the proportion of suitable habitat (i.e., wetlands); (2) the proportion of potential dispersal barriers (forest) in the surrounding landscape; (3) altitude; (4) habitat area and (5) management (mowing versus grazing). Three surveys per study site were conducted during the adult flight period to estimate occurrence and density of each species. For the best disperser B. selene the probability of occurrence was positively related to increasing proportion of wetland on a large spatial scale (radius: 4,000 m), for the medium disperser B. ino on an intermediate spatial scale (2,000 m) and for the poorest disperser B. titania on a small spatial scale (1,000 m). Nearby forest did not negatively affect butterfly species distribution but instead enhanced the probability of occurrence and the population density of B. titania. The fen-specialist B. selene had a higher probability of occurrence and higher population densities on grazed compared to mown fens. The altitude of the habitat patches affected the occurrence of the three species and increasing habitat area enhanced the probability of occurrence of B. selene and B. ino. We conclude that, the surrounding landscape is of relevance for species distribution, but management and habitat fragmentation are often more important. We suggest that butterfly conservation should not focus only on a patch scale, but also on a landscape scale, taking into account species-specific dispersal abilities.

dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10980-007-9178-3
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-41049092876
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/36403
dc.identifier.wos000254112100003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectConnectivity
dc.subjectDetectability
dc.subjectDispersal
dc.subjectFens
dc.subjectHabitat quality
dc.subjectLandscape context
dc.subjectMetapopulations
dc.subjectPopulation density
dc.subjectSwitzerland
dc.subject.ddc570 Life sciences; biology
dc.subject.ddc590 Animals (Zoology)
dc.title

How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands?

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleLandscape Ecology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameSpringer
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend283
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart269
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume23
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich, Universität Bayreuth
uzh.contributor.authorCozzi, G
uzh.contributor.authorMüller, C B
uzh.contributor.authorKrauss, J
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.document.availabilitycontent_undefined
uzh.document.availabilitypostprint
uzh.document.availabilitypublished_version
uzh.eprint.datestamp2009-01-16 15:30:23
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-08-01 01:44:26
uzh.eprint.statusChange2009-01-16 15:30:23
uzh.harvester.ethYes
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-8504
uzh.jdb.eprintsId41271
uzh.oastatus.unpaywallgreen
uzh.oastatus.zoraGreen
uzh.publication.citationCozzi, G., Müller, C. B., & Krauss, J. (2008). How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands? Landscape Ecology, 23, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9178-3
uzh.publication.originalworkoriginal
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.scopus.impact68
uzh.scopus.subjectsGeography, Planning and Development
uzh.scopus.subjectsEcology
uzh.scopus.subjectsNature and Landscape Conservation
uzh.workflow.doajuzh.workflow.doaj.false
uzh.workflow.eprintid8504
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatusrestricted
uzh.workflow.revisions169
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
uzh.wos.impact65
Files

Original bundle

Name:
ZORA_NL_8504.pdf
Size:
557.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Name:
Cozzi_habitat-management_V.pdf
Size:
414.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Name:
Cozzi_habitat-management_publ_V.pdf
Size:
541.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Publication available in collections: