Publication:

CD122-directed interleukin-2 treatment mechanisms in bladder cancer differ from αPD-L1 and include tissue-selective γδ T cell activation

Date

Date

Date
2021
Journal Article
Published version
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-06-14T03:32:48Z
cris.lastimport.wos2025-07-26T01:30:34Z
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-10T16:22:37Z
dc.date.available2022-02-10T16:22:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-01
dc.description.abstract

BackgroundAnti-programmed death-ligand 1 (αPD-L1) immunotherapy is approved to treat bladder cancer (BC) but is effective in <30% of patients. Interleukin (IL)-2/αIL-2 complexes (IL-2c) that preferentially target IL-2 receptor β (CD122) augment CD8$^{+}$ antitumor T cells known to improve αPD-L1 efficacy. We hypothesized that the tumor microenvironment, including local immune cells in primary versus metastatic BC, differentially affects immunotherapy responses and that IL-2c effects could differ from, and thus complement αPD-L1.MethodsWe studied mechanisms of IL-2c and αPD-L1 efficacy using PD-L1$^{+}$ mouse BC cell lines MB49 and MBT-2 in orthotopic (bladder) and metastatic (lung) sites.ResultsIL-2c reduced orthotopic tumor burden and extended survival in MB49 and MBT-2 BC models, similar to αPD-L1. Using antibody-mediated cell depletions and genetically T cell-deficient mice, we unexpectedly found that CD8$^{+}$ T cells were not necessary for IL-2c efficacy against tumors in bladder, whereas γδ T cells, not reported to contribute to αPD-L1 efficacy, were indispensable for IL-2c efficacy there. αPD-L1 responsiveness in bladder required conventional T cells as expected, but not γδ T cells, altogether defining distinct mechanisms for IL-2c and αPD-L1 efficacy. γδ T cells did not improve IL-2c treatment of subcutaneously challenged BC or orthotopic (peritoneal) ovarian cancer, consistent with tissue-specific and/or tumor-specific γδ T cell contributions to IL-2c efficacy. IL-2c significantly altered bladder intratumoral γδ T cell content, activation status, and specific γδ T cell subsets with antitumor or protumor effector functions. Neither IL-2c nor αPD-L1 alone treated lung metastatic MB49 or MBT-2 BC, but their combination improved survival in both models. Combination treatment efficacy in lungs required CD8$^{+}$ T cells but not γδ T cells.ConclusionsMechanistic insights into differential IL-2c and αPD-L1 treatment and tissue-dependent effects could help develop rational combination treatment strategies to improve treatment efficacy in distinct cancers. These studies also provide insights into γδ T cell contributions to immunotherapy in bladder and engagement of adaptive immunity by IL-2c plus αPD-L1 to treat refractory lung metastases.

dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jitc-2020-002051
dc.identifier.issn2051-1426
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104101376
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/192926
dc.identifier.wos000641483700002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectCancer Research
dc.subjectPharmacology
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectMolecular Medicine
dc.subjectImmunology
dc.subjectImmunology and Allergy
dc.subject.ddc610 Medicine & health
dc.title

CD122-directed interleukin-2 treatment mechanisms in bladder cancer differ from αPD-L1 and include tissue-selective γδ T cell activation

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameBioMed Central
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestarte002051
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid33849925
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume9
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Mays Cancer Center
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversitatsSpital Zurich
uzh.contributor.affiliationMoffitt Cancer Center
uzh.contributor.affiliationMays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
uzh.contributor.affiliationMays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Clayton Foundation for Research
uzh.contributor.authorReyes, Ryan Michael
uzh.contributor.authorDeng, Yilun
uzh.contributor.authorZhang, Deyi
uzh.contributor.authorJi, Niannian
uzh.contributor.authorMukherjee, Neelam
uzh.contributor.authorWheeler, Karen
uzh.contributor.authorGupta, Harshita B
uzh.contributor.authorPadron, Alvaro S
uzh.contributor.authorKancharla, Aravind
uzh.contributor.authorZhang, Chenghao
uzh.contributor.authorGarcia, Myrna
uzh.contributor.authorKornepati, Anand V R
uzh.contributor.authorBoyman, Onur
uzh.contributor.authorConejo-Garcia, Jose R
uzh.contributor.authorSvatek, Robert S
uzh.contributor.authorCuriel, Tyler J
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.document.availabilitypublished_version
uzh.eprint.datestamp2022-02-10 16:22:37
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-07-26 01:51:25
uzh.eprint.statusChange2022-02-10 16:22:37
uzh.harvester.ethYes
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-215105
uzh.jdb.eprintsId38187
uzh.oastatus.unpaywallgold
uzh.oastatus.zoraGold
uzh.publication.citationReyes, R. M., Deng, Y., Zhang, D., Ji, N., Mukherjee, N., Wheeler, K., Gupta, H. B., Padron, A. S., Kancharla, A., Zhang, C., Garcia, M., Kornepati, A. V. R., Boyman, O., Conejo-Garcia, J. R., Svatek, R. S., & Curiel, T. J. (2021). CD122-directed interleukin-2 treatment mechanisms in bladder cancer differ from αPD-L1 and include tissue-selective γδ T cell activation. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, 9, e002051. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002051
uzh.publication.freeAccessAtpubmedid
uzh.publication.originalworkoriginal
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.scopus.impact15
uzh.scopus.subjectsImmunology and Allergy
uzh.scopus.subjectsImmunology
uzh.scopus.subjectsMolecular Medicine
uzh.scopus.subjectsOncology
uzh.scopus.subjectsPharmacology
uzh.scopus.subjectsCancer Research
uzh.workflow.doajuzh.workflow.doaj.true
uzh.workflow.eprintid215105
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatuspublic
uzh.workflow.revisions47
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.sourceCrossRef:10.1136/jitc-2020-002051
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
uzh.wos.impact14
Files

Original bundle

Name:
jitc-2020-002051.pdf
Size:
1.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Publication available in collections: