Publication:

Evaluating the key assumptions underlying dendro-provenancing: How to spruce it up with a scissor plot

Date

Date

Date
2018
Journal Article
Published version
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-05-28T03:31:47Z
cris.lastimport.wos2025-07-20T01:31:31Z
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-15T08:39:37Z
dc.date.available2019-02-15T08:39:37Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstract

In this paper, dendro-provenancing is framed as a search for statistical Nearest Neighbors. The ‘k-Nearest Neighbors leave one-out cross-validation’ process (k-NN) is proposed as a method for validating dendro-provenancing approaches. Furthermore, it allows researchers to consistently compare and evaluate different proximity measures with respect to their suitability for dendro-provenancing. The validation process is demonstrated on a data set of 401 ring-width series of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) encompassing 15 sites along elevational gradients in north-eastern Switzerland. Moreover, a new type of plot, the so-called scissor plot, is introduced to visualize the k-NN validation process. Results indicate that dendro-provenancing depends heavily on differences in between sites high-frequencysignal. Mean classification success for the relevant stages of the k-NN (CS¯Ropen)1 ranged from 71.8% to 79.2% for the best performing measures. Classification errors occurred mainly between sites at elevations of 1000–1198m a.s.l. At all other elevations and between different regions of the study area, only moderate differences in classification performance were detected. Thus, the results indicate that dendro-provenancing may be principally feasible even in a small region as studied here.

dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dendro.2018.09.008
dc.identifier.issn1125-7865
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85054928025
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/155483
dc.identifier.wos000451071500015
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subject.ddc900 History
dc.title

Evaluating the key assumptions underlying dendro-provenancing: How to spruce it up with a scissor plot

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleDendrochronologia
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameElsevier
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend145
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart131
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume52
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich, ETH Zürich
uzh.contributor.authorGut, Urs
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.document.availabilitynone
uzh.eprint.datestamp2019-02-15 08:39:37
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-07-20 01:36:31
uzh.eprint.statusChange2019-02-15 08:39:37
uzh.harvester.ethYes
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-168137
uzh.jdb.eprintsId33517
uzh.oastatus.unpaywallhybrid
uzh.oastatus.zoraClosed
uzh.publication.citationGut, Urs (2018). Evaluating the key assumptions underlying dendro-provenancing: How to spruce it up with a scissor plot. Dendrochronologia, 52:131-145.
uzh.publication.originalworkoriginal
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.relatedUrl.typepub
uzh.relatedUrl.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1125786518300730?via%3Dihub
uzh.scopus.impact11
uzh.scopus.subjectsEcology
uzh.scopus.subjectsPlant Science
uzh.workflow.chairSubjectChair Prof. Dr. Ph. Della Casa / Dep. Prehistoric Archaeology
uzh.workflow.doajuzh.workflow.doaj.false
uzh.workflow.eprintid168137
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatusrestricted
uzh.workflow.revisions58
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
uzh.wos.impact11
Files

Original bundle

Name:
1-s2.0-S1125786518300730-main.pdf
Size:
5.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Downloadable by admins only
Publication available in collections: