Publication:

Social media and political agenda setting

Date

Date

Date
2022
Journal Article
Published version
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-06-12T03:37:18Z
cris.lastimport.wos2025-07-25T01:32:29Z
cris.virtual.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5592-9648
cris.virtual.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-3048
cris.virtualsource.orcid5d439073-c159-4d3e-b406-38df974a67a2
cris.virtualsource.orcid0dc0a8f3-be6f-4545-a8c2-36c89f495442
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T17:07:39Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T17:07:39Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-02
dc.description.abstract

What is the role of social media in political agenda setting? Digital platforms have reduced the gatekeeping power of traditional media and, potentially, they have increased the capacity of various kinds of actors to shape the agenda. We study this question in the Swiss context by examining the connections between three agendas: the traditional media agenda, the social media agenda of parties, and the social media agenda of politicians. Specifically, we validate and apply supervised machine learning classifiers to categorize 2.78 million articles published in 84 newspapers, 6,500 tweets posted on official party accounts, and 210,000 tweets posted by politicians on their own accounts from January 2018 until December 2019. We first use the classifier to measure the salience of the four most relevant issues of the period: the environment, Europe, gender equality, and immigration. Then, using a vector autoregression (VAR) approach, we analyze the relationship between the three agendas. Results show that not only do the traditional media agenda, the social media agenda of parties, and the social media agenda of politicians influence one another but, overall, no agenda leads the others more than it is led by them. There is one important exception: for the environment issue, the social media agenda of parties is more predictive of the traditional media agenda than vice-versa. These findings underscore how closely different agendas are tied together, but also show that advocacy campaigns may play an important role in both constraining and enabling parties to push their specific agendas.

dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390
dc.identifier.issn1058-4609
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105214033
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/189006
dc.identifier.wos000646105200001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectsociology and political science
dc.subjectcommunication agenda setting
dc.subjectsocial media
dc.subjectnewspapers
dc.subjectsupervised machine learning
dc.subject.ddc320 Political science
dc.title

Social media and political agenda setting

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitlePolitical Communication
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameTaylor & Francis
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend60
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart39
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume39
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Dublin
uzh.contributor.authorGilardi, Fabrizio
uzh.contributor.authorGessler, Theresa
uzh.contributor.authorKubli, Maël
uzh.contributor.authorMüller, Stefan
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.document.availabilitypublished_version
uzh.eprint.datestamp2021-12-08 17:07:39
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-07-25 01:39:33
uzh.eprint.statusChange2021-12-08 17:07:39
uzh.funder.nameH2020
uzh.funder.projectNumber883121
uzh.funder.projectTitlePRODIGI - Problem Definition in the Digital Democracy
uzh.harvester.ethYes
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-210376
uzh.jdb.eprintsId30799
uzh.oastatus.unpaywallhybrid
uzh.oastatus.zoraHybrid
uzh.oatransformation.contractTRUE
uzh.oatransformation.contractDate01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021
uzh.oatransformation.contractIDTandF2021
uzh.oatransformation.contractNameTaylor & Francis Journals
uzh.oatransformation.contractURL
uzh.publication.citationGilardi, Fabrizio; Gessler, Theresa; Kubli, Maël; Müller, Stefan (2022). Social media and political agenda setting. Political Communication, 39(1):39-60.
uzh.publication.originalworkoriginal
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.scopus.impact189
uzh.scopus.subjectsCommunication
uzh.scopus.subjectsSociology and Political Science
uzh.workflow.doajuzh.workflow.doaj.false
uzh.workflow.eprintid210376
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatuspublic
uzh.workflow.revisions50
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.sourceCrossRef:10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
uzh.wos.impact157
Files

Original bundle

Name:
ZORA210376.pdf
Size:
921.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Publication available in collections: