Publication: Moral certainties – subjective, objective, objectionable?
Moral certainties – subjective, objective, objectionable?
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Glock, H.-J. (2022). Moral certainties – subjective, objective, objectionable? In C. Eriksen, J. Hermann, N. O’Hara, & N. Pleasants (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on moral certainty (pp. 171–191). Routledge, Taylor&Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003178927-10
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
The idea of moral certainties is venerable, highly contentious, and nevertheless alive. What I call “hinge ethics” (in analogy to hinge epistemology) combines three currents – meta-ethical concerns about the scope and limits of moral knowledge and objectivity, the idea of limits of doubt as articulated in On Certainty, and sympathies for Wittgensteinian ideas about ethics. This essay critically assesses hinge ethics, focusing on Nigel Pleasants’ work. My main objection is not that Wittgensteinian ideas about certainty cannot be transf
Metrics
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Editors
Title of Book
Title of Book
Title of Book
Place of Publication
Place of Publication
Place of Publication
Publisher
Publisher
Publisher
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISBN or e-ISBN
ISBN or e-ISBN
ISBN or e-ISBN
Additional Information
Additional Information
Additional Information
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Views
Citations
Glock, H.-J. (2022). Moral certainties – subjective, objective, objectionable? In C. Eriksen, J. Hermann, N. O’Hara, & N. Pleasants (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on moral certainty (pp. 171–191). Routledge, Taylor&Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003178927-10