Publication: Magnet resonance angiography versus conventional angiography for the planning of reconstructive surgeries
Magnet resonance angiography versus conventional angiography for the planning of reconstructive surgeries
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Köhler, C., Weishaupt, D., Guggenheim, M., Künzi, W., & Wedler, V. (2007). Magnet resonance angiography versus conventional angiography for the planning of reconstructive surgeries. European Journal of Trauma, 33(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-007-5130-0
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Assessing the vascular status and anatomy of the lower extremity is of crucial importance when planning the coverage of a tissue defect with a free flap. The standard techniques comprise the clinical examination, Doppler ultrasound and Doppler sonography for healthy patients without suspected direct trauma to the vascular system, and conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA), respectively, in case of traumatized vessels or patients with peripheral arterial obstructive disease. Materials:: We have conducted a prospective study
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
- Köhler, Christian
- Weishaupt, Dominik
- Guggenheim, Merlin
- Künzi, Walter
- Wedler, Volker
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Köhler, C., Weishaupt, D., Guggenheim, M., Künzi, W., & Wedler, V. (2007). Magnet resonance angiography versus conventional angiography for the planning of reconstructive surgeries. European Journal of Trauma, 33(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-007-5130-0
