Publication:

Use of a patient preference predictor to help make medical decisions for incapacitated patients

Date

Date

Date
2014
Journal Article
Published version
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-07-30T03:43:09Z
cris.lastimport.wos2025-07-11T01:30:43Z
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-24T13:53:46Z
dc.date.available2014-03-24T13:53:46Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstract

The standard approach to treatment decision making for incapacitated patients often fails to provide treatment consistent with the patient's preferences and values and places significant stress on surrogate decision makers. These shortcomings provide compelling reason to search for methods to improve current practice. Shared decision making between surrogates and clinicians has important advantages, but it does not provide a way to determine patients' treatment preferences. Hence, shared decision making leaves families with the stressful challenge of identifying the patient's preferred treatment option. To address this concern, the present paper proposes to incorporate the use of a "Patient Preference Predictor" (PPP) into the shared decision-making process between surrogates and clinicians. A PPP would predict which treatment option a given incapacitated patient would most likely prefer, based on the individual's characteristics and information on what treatment preferences are correlated with these characteristics. Use of a PPP is likely to increase the chances that incapacitated patients are treated consistent with their preferences and values and might reduce the stress and burden on their surrogates. Including a PPP in the shared decision-making process therefore has the potential to realize important ethical goals for making treatment decisions for incapacitated patients. The present paper justifies this approach on conceptual and normative grounds.

dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jmp/jhu001
dc.identifier.issn0360-5310
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84898931802
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/103457
dc.identifier.wos000333089000002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medicine & health
dc.title

Use of a patient preference predictor to help make medical decisions for incapacitated patients

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleJournal of Medicine and Philosophy
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameTaylor & Francis
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend129
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart104
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid24526785
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume39
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.affiliationKing's College London, University of Zurich
uzh.contributor.affiliationNIH Clinical Center
uzh.contributor.authorRid, Annette
uzh.contributor.authorWendler, David
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.document.availabilitynone
uzh.eprint.datestamp2014-03-24 13:53:46
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-07-30 03:43:09
uzh.eprint.statusChange2014-03-24 13:53:46
uzh.harvester.ethYes
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-94037
uzh.jdb.eprintsId14032
uzh.oastatus.unpaywallbronze
uzh.oastatus.zoraClosed
uzh.publication.citationRid, Annette; Wendler, David (2014). Use of a patient preference predictor to help make medical decisions for incapacitated patients. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 39(2):104-129.
uzh.publication.freeAccessAtdoi
uzh.publication.originalworkoriginal
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.scopus.impact57
uzh.scopus.subjectsIssues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
uzh.scopus.subjectsPhilosophy
uzh.workflow.doajuzh.workflow.doaj.false
uzh.workflow.eprintid94037
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatusrestricted
uzh.workflow.revisions65
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
uzh.wos.impact50
Files

Original bundle

Name:
2014_Rid_A_Use_of_a_Patient_Preference_Predictor.pdf
Size:
374.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Downloadable by admins only
Publication available in collections: