Publication: Mitigation options for enteric methane emissions from dairy animals: an evaluation for potential CDM projects in India
Mitigation options for enteric methane emissions from dairy animals: an evaluation for potential CDM projects in India
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Sirohi, S., Michaelowa, A., & Sirohi, S. K. (2007). Mitigation options for enteric methane emissions from dairy animals: an evaluation for potential CDM projects in India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9012-7
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Enteric fermentation in livestock is an important source of anthropogenic methane emission. India, with its large livestock population, is estimated to contribute 10.8 Tg of methane annually from this source. An evaluation of various methane mitigation options indicate that some of the available technologies like, diet supplementation with feed additive and molasses urea product are highly cost effective in reducing enteric methane emissions. The gross cost of methane abatement from use of feed additive monensin premix ranges from €0.
Metrics
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
- Sirohi, Smita
- Michaelowa, Axel
- Sirohi, S K
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Views
Citations
Sirohi, S., Michaelowa, A., & Sirohi, S. K. (2007). Mitigation options for enteric methane emissions from dairy animals: an evaluation for potential CDM projects in India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9012-7