Publication: Intent matters: Resolving the intentional versus incidental learning paradox in episodic long-term memory
Intent matters: Resolving the intentional versus incidental learning paradox in episodic long-term memory
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Popov, V., & Dames, H. (2023). Intent matters: Resolving the intentional versus incidental learning paradox in episodic long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 152(1), 268–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001272
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Decades of research have established that the intent to remember information has no effect on episodic long-term memory. This claim, which is routinely taught in introductory cognitive psychology courses, is based entirely on pure-list between-subjects designs in which memory performance is equal for intentional and incidental learning groups. In the current 11 experiments, participants made semantic judgements about each word in a list but they had to remember only words presented in a specific color. We demonstrate that in such mixe
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Popov, V., & Dames, H. (2023). Intent matters: Resolving the intentional versus incidental learning paradox in episodic long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 152(1), 268–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001272