Publication:

Patient preference predictors revisited: technically feasible, ethically desirable, yet must be clinically relevant

Date

Date

Date
2025
Journal Article
Published version

Citations

Citation copied

Ferrario, A., Göcking, B., Brandi, G., Keller Emanuela, E. S., & Biller-Andorno, N. (2025). Patient preference predictors revisited: technically feasible, ethically desirable, yet must be clinically relevant. Critical Care, 29(1), 437. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05637-8

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Although goal-concordant care is central to patient-centered medicine, determining treatment preferences for incapacitated patients remains a challenge. Nearly two decades ago, algorithms were proposed to estimate the most likely treatment preferences in the absence of advance directives, aiming to support surrogate decision making. This idea has evolved into a race toward increasingly complex models, driven by the assumption that expanding data collection and refining predictive methods will yield more accurate approximations of pati

Metrics

Citations

Additional indexing

Creators (Authors)

Journal/Series Title

Journal/Series Title

Journal/Series Title

Volume

Volume

Volume
29

Number

Number

Number
1

Page range/Item number

Page range/Item number

Page range/Item number
437

Item Type

Item Type

Item Type
Journal Article

Dewey Decimal Classifikation

Dewey Decimal Classifikation

Dewey Decimal Classifikation

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, Brain injuries, Critical care, Decision-making, Goal of care preferences, Goal-concordant care, Machine learning, Neurological intensive care unit, Patient preference

Language

Language

Language
English

Publication date

Publication date

Publication date
2025-10-16

Date available

Date available

Date available
2025-11-20

Publisher

Publisher

Publisher
BioMed Central

ISSN or e-ISSN

ISSN or e-ISSN

ISSN or e-ISSN
1364-8535

OA Status

OA Status

OA Status
Gold

Free Access at

Free Access at

Free Access at
DOI

PubMed ID

PubMed ID

PubMed ID

Metrics

Citations

Citations

Citation copied

Ferrario, A., Göcking, B., Brandi, G., Keller Emanuela, E. S., & Biller-Andorno, N. (2025). Patient preference predictors revisited: technically feasible, ethically desirable, yet must be clinically relevant. Critical Care, 29(1), 437. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05637-8

Gold Open Access
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

Files

Files
Files available to download:1

Files

Files

Files
Files available to download:1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image