Publication: Patient preference predictors revisited: technically feasible, ethically desirable, yet must be clinically relevant
Patient preference predictors revisited: technically feasible, ethically desirable, yet must be clinically relevant
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Ferrario, A., Göcking, B., Brandi, G., Keller Emanuela, E. S., & Biller-Andorno, N. (2025). Patient preference predictors revisited: technically feasible, ethically desirable, yet must be clinically relevant. Critical Care, 29(1), 437. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05637-8
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Although goal-concordant care is central to patient-centered medicine, determining treatment preferences for incapacitated patients remains a challenge. Nearly two decades ago, algorithms were proposed to estimate the most likely treatment preferences in the absence of advance directives, aiming to support surrogate decision making. This idea has evolved into a race toward increasingly complex models, driven by the assumption that expanding data collection and refining predictive methods will yield more accurate approximations of pati
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
Publisher
Publisher
Publisher
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Citations
Ferrario, A., Göcking, B., Brandi, G., Keller Emanuela, E. S., & Biller-Andorno, N. (2025). Patient preference predictors revisited: technically feasible, ethically desirable, yet must be clinically relevant. Critical Care, 29(1), 437. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05637-8