Publication: Why should beneficiaries be subjects (or objects)? Affaction and grammatical relations
Why should beneficiaries be subjects (or objects)? Affaction and grammatical relations
Date
Date
Date
2011
Book Section
Published version
Citations
Zúñiga, F. (2011). Why should beneficiaries be subjects (or objects)? Affaction and grammatical relations. In S. Kittilä & et al (Eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles (No. 99; Issue 99, pp. 329–348). John Benjamins.
Metrics
Views
139 since deposited on 2011-12-12
Acq. date: 2025-11-14
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Editors
Title of Book
Title of Book
Title of Book
Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles
Place of Publication
Place of Publication
Place of Publication
Amsterdam
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
329
Page end
Page end
Page end
348
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Book Section
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
English
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
2011
Date available
Date available
Date available
2011-12-12
Series Name
Series Name
Series Name
Typological Studies in Language
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
0167-7373
ISBN or e-ISBN
ISBN or e-ISBN
ISBN or e-ISBN
978-90-272-0680-0
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Closed
Metrics
Views
139 since deposited on 2011-12-12
Acq. date: 2025-11-14
Citations
Zúñiga, F. (2011). Why should beneficiaries be subjects (or objects)? Affaction and grammatical relations. In S. Kittilä & et al (Eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles (No. 99; Issue 99, pp. 329–348). John Benjamins.
Closed
Loading...
No files available