Publication: Interactive visual labelling versus active learning: an experimental comparison
Interactive visual labelling versus active learning: an experimental comparison
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Chegini, M., Bernard, J., Cui, J., Chegini, F., Sourin, A., Andrews, K., & Schreck, T. (2020). Interactive visual labelling versus active learning: an experimental comparison. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 21(4), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1631/fitee.1900549
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Methods from supervised machine learning allow the classification of new data automatically and are tremendously helpful for data analysis. The quality of supervised maching learning depends not only on the type of algorithm used, but also on the quality of the labelled dataset used to train the classifier. Labelling instances in a training dataset is often done manually relying on selections and annotations by expert analysts, and is often a tedious and time-consuming process. Active learning algorithms can automatically determine a
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Keywords
Scope
Scope
Scope
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
Publisher
Publisher
Publisher
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Other Identification Number
Other Identification Number
Other Identification Number
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Chegini, M., Bernard, J., Cui, J., Chegini, F., Sourin, A., Andrews, K., & Schreck, T. (2020). Interactive visual labelling versus active learning: an experimental comparison. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 21(4), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1631/fitee.1900549