Publication:

Repair Bond Strength of a CAD/CAM Nanoceramic Resin and Direct Composite Resin: Effect of Aging and Surface Conditioning Methods

Date

Date

Date
2020
Journal Article
Published version
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-06-07T03:42:16Z
cris.lastimport.wos2025-06-23T02:01:40Z
cris.virtual.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9623-6098
cris.virtualsource.orcid897056e5-e91d-44fc-8110-837317253107
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-27T14:07:51Z
dc.date.available2021-01-27T14:07:51Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstract

PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of surface conditioning methods and aging on the repair bond strength between resin composite and nanoceramic CAD/CAM resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-four blocks of nanoceramic CAD/CAM resin (NCR) (Lava Ultimate, 3M Oral Care) (10 x 5 x 2 mm3) and resin composite (Filtek Z350, 3M Oral Care) (RC) were made, embedded in acrylic resin, polished (#600, #800, #1200) and randomly divided into 8 groups (n = 12 each) according to surface conditioning methods (air abrasion with 30-μm CoJet [CJ] or air abrasion with 50-μm Al2O3 [AB]) and aging prior to repair (without aging, 24 h in water at 37°C; with aging 6 months in water at 37°C). The blocks were air abraded (20 s, 2.5 bar, 10 mm) using a standardized device. A layer of adhesive resin (Scotchbond Universal) was applied (20 s) and photopolymerized for 20 s. RC cylinders (Ø = 2 mm; h = 2 mm) were then bonded to the NCR substrates using a Teflon matrix and photopolymerized for 40 s. All specimens were thermocycled (10,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C) and submitted to the shear bond test (50 kgf, 0.5 mm/min) to measure repair strength. Data (MPa) were analyzed using 3-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Failure analysis was performed using stereomicroscopy (20X). RESULTS ANOVA revealed a significant effect of only the "material" factor (p = 0.00). The group NCR6mCJ presented bond strengths (29.37 ± 5.41) which were significantly higher than those of the NCR24hCJ (20.88 ± 5.74) and RC groups (p < 0.05). The group RC24hCJ (19.71 ± 4.21) presented the lowest shear bond strength (p < 0.05). Failure analysis revealed predominantly type B mixed failures (adhesive+cohesive in the substrate material) except for the groups NCR24hCJ and NCR6mAB, where mainly type C failure (adhesive+cohesive at the RC) was observed. CONCLUSION Air abrasion with Al2O3 particles or silicatization with CoJet followed by adhesive resin application are effective surface conditioning methods for the repair of nanoceramic CAD/CAM resin with resin composite.

dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a44551
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85085155253
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/178958
dc.identifier.wos000535962600006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medicine & health
dc.title

Repair Bond Strength of a CAD/CAM Nanoceramic Resin and Direct Composite Resin: Effect of Aging and Surface Conditioning Methods

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameQuintessence Publishing
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend283
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart275
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid32435768
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume22
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
uzh.contributor.affiliationUNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
uzh.contributor.affiliationPrivate Practice
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
uzh.contributor.affiliationUNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
uzh.contributor.authorMoura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte
uzh.contributor.authorDal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira
uzh.contributor.authordo Nascimento Januário, Ana Beatriz
uzh.contributor.authorVerissímo, Aretha Heitor
uzh.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antonio
uzh.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
uzh.contributor.authorSouza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.document.availabilitynone
uzh.eprint.datestamp2021-01-27 14:07:51
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-06-23 02:07:21
uzh.eprint.statusChange2021-01-27 14:07:51
uzh.harvester.ethYes
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-198098
uzh.jdb.eprintsId24821
uzh.oastatus.zoraClosed
uzh.publication.citationMoura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte; Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira; do Nascimento Januário, Ana Beatriz; Verissímo, Aretha Heitor; Bottino, Marco Antonio; Özcan, Mutlu; Souza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção (2020). Repair Bond Strength of a CAD/CAM Nanoceramic Resin and Direct Composite Resin: Effect of Aging and Surface Conditioning Methods. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 22(3):275-283.
uzh.publication.originalworkoriginal
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.scopus.impact9
uzh.scopus.subjectsOrthodontics
uzh.scopus.subjectsOral Surgery
uzh.scopus.subjectsPeriodontics
uzh.workflow.doajuzh.workflow.doaj.false
uzh.workflow.eprintid198098
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatusrestricted
uzh.workflow.revisions42
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.sourcePubMed:PMID:32435768
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
uzh.wos.impact9
Files

Original bundle

Name:
44_pub.pdf
Size:
444.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Downloadable by admins only
Publication available in collections: