Publication: Bone augmentation at peri-implant dehiscence defects comparing a synthetic polyethylene glycol hydrogel matrix vs. standard guided bone regeneration techniques
Bone augmentation at peri-implant dehiscence defects comparing a synthetic polyethylene glycol hydrogel matrix vs. standard guided bone regeneration techniques
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Thoma, D. S., Jung, U.-W., Park, J.-Y., Bienz, S. P., Hüsler, J., & Jung, R. E. (2017). Bone augmentation at peri-implant dehiscence defects comparing a synthetic polyethylene glycol hydrogel matrix vs. standard guided bone regeneration techniques. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(7), e76–e83. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12877
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to test whether or not the use of a polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel with or without the addition of an arginylglycylaspartic acid (RGD) sequence applied as a matrix in combination with hydroxyapatite/tricalciumphosphate (HA/TCP) results in similar peri-implant bone regeneration as traditional guided bone regeneration procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 12 beagle dogs, implant placement and peri-implant bone regeneration were performed 2 months after tooth extraction in the maxilla. Two standar
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
- Thoma, Daniel S
- Jung, Ui-Won
- Park, Jin-Young
- Bienz, Stefan P
- Hüsler, Jürg
- Jung, Ronald E
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page Range
Page Range
Page Range
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Citations
Thoma, D. S., Jung, U.-W., Park, J.-Y., Bienz, S. P., Hüsler, J., & Jung, R. E. (2017). Bone augmentation at peri-implant dehiscence defects comparing a synthetic polyethylene glycol hydrogel matrix vs. standard guided bone regeneration techniques. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(7), e76–e83. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12877
