Publication:

Functional MR imaging exposes differential brain responses to syntax and prosody during auditory sentence comprehension

Date

Date

Date
2003
Journal Article
Published version
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-07-25T03:40:33Z
cris.lastimport.wos2025-08-09T01:31:55Z
cris.virtual.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-5533
cris.virtualsource.orcid99ac2b1e-0265-4987-a770-44fc0bb621a3
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-30T09:14:25Z
dc.date.available2013-04-30T09:14:25Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.description.abstract

In two experiments using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging we studied healthy adults who listened to sentences that either focused on lexical, syntactic, or prosodic information. In the first experiment two sentence conditions were employed: normal speech which contained function and content words, and pseudo speech which contained function and pseudo words. Sentence processing generally activated the superior temporal region (STR) bilaterally. Relative to normal sentences hearing pseudo sentences corresponded to stronger brain responses in the anterior STR (planum polare) and in the fronto-opercular region bilaterally. A second experiment was designed to test whether right hemisphere activation can be explained by processing prosodic aspects of speech, i.e. sentence intonation. In addition to normal and pseudo speech the second study examined degraded speech that neither contained morphosyntactic nor lexical information but only prosodic information, i.e. intonation, amplitude, duration, and spectral tilt. Statistical analyses based on regions of interest found differential activation patterns for frontal and temporal areas in the brain. Relative to sentences, degraded speech produced generally stronger activation in frontal regions. Furthermore, the data pointed to a particular involvement of right fronto-lateral regions in processing sentence melody. For the STR an inverse pattern was found: relative to degraded speech sentence conditions produced stronger activation in anterior, mid, and posterior parts of the left supratemporal plane, particular in the planum polare and planum temporale. In sum, the results show that the left planum polare and the left planum temporale mediate syntactic and semantic processing, whereas right fronto-lateral areas seem to be more sensitive to prosodic cues available in spoken language.

dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0911-6044(03)00026-5
dc.identifier.issn0911-6044
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0038309007
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/91766
dc.identifier.wos000184301000003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychology
dc.title

Functional MR imaging exposes differential brain responses to syntax and prosody during auditory sentence comprehension

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleJournal of Neurolinguistics
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number4-5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameElsevier
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend300
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart277
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume16
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.affiliationMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh
uzh.contributor.affiliationMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
uzh.contributor.affiliationMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
uzh.contributor.authorMeyer, Martin
uzh.contributor.authorAlter, Kai
uzh.contributor.authorFriederici, Angela
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.document.availabilityno_document
uzh.eprint.datestamp2013-04-30 09:14:25
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-08-09 01:37:42
uzh.eprint.statusChange2013-04-30 09:14:25
uzh.harvester.ethNo
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.jdb.eprintsId17397
uzh.oastatus.unpaywallgreen
uzh.oastatus.zoraClosed
uzh.publication.citationMeyer, Martin; Alter, Kai; Friederici, Angela (2003). Functional MR imaging exposes differential brain responses to syntax and prosody during auditory sentence comprehension. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(4-5):277-300.
uzh.publication.originalworkoriginal
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.scopus.impact31
uzh.scopus.subjectsExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
uzh.scopus.subjectsArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
uzh.scopus.subjectsLinguistics and Language
uzh.scopus.subjectsCognitive Neuroscience
uzh.workflow.doajuzh.workflow.doaj.false
uzh.workflow.eprintid77877
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatusnone
uzh.workflow.revisions50
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
uzh.wos.impact30
Publication available in collections: