Publication: Are ratings the worst form of credit assessment apart from all the others?
Are ratings the worst form of credit assessment apart from all the others?
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Bloechlinger, A., & Leippold, M. (2018). Are ratings the worst form of credit assessment apart from all the others? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(1), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000874
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
We present a prediction model to forecast corporate defaults. In a theoretical model, under incomplete information in a market with publicly traded equity, we show that our approach must outperform ratings, Altman’s Z-score, and Merton’s distance to default. We reconcile the statistical and structural approaches under a common framework, i.e., our approach nests Altman’s and Merton’s approaches as special cases. Empirically, we cannot reject the superiority of our approach.Furthermore, the numbers of observed defaults align well with
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Scope
Scope
Scope
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Other Identification Number
Other Identification Number
Other Identification Number
Related URLs
Related URLs
Related URLs
Citations
Bloechlinger, A., & Leippold, M. (2018). Are ratings the worst form of credit assessment apart from all the others? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(1), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000874