Publication: A case study competition among methods for analyzing large spatial data
A case study competition among methods for analyzing large spatial data
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Heaton, M. J., Datta, A., Finley, A. O., Furrer, R., Guinness, J., Guhaniyogi, R., Gerber, F., Gramacy, R. B., Hammerling, D., Katzfuss, M., Lindgren, F., Nychka, D. W., Sun, F., & Zammit-Mangion, A. (2019). A case study competition among methods for analyzing large spatial data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 24(3), 398–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-018-00348-w
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
The Gaussian process is an indispensable tool for spatial data analysts. The onset of the “big data” era, however, has lead to the traditional Gaussian process being computationally infeasible for modern spatial data. As such, various alternatives to the full Gaussian process that are more amenable to handling big spatial data have been proposed. These modern methods often exploit low-rank structures and/or multi-core and multi-threaded computing environments to facilitate computation. This study provides, first, an introductory overv
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Journal/Series Title
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page Range
Page Range
Page Range
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Funder name
Funder name
Funder name
Grant ID
Grant ID
Grant ID
Project Title
Project Title
Project Title
Citations
Heaton, M. J., Datta, A., Finley, A. O., Furrer, R., Guinness, J., Guhaniyogi, R., Gerber, F., Gramacy, R. B., Hammerling, D., Katzfuss, M., Lindgren, F., Nychka, D. W., Sun, F., & Zammit-Mangion, A. (2019). A case study competition among methods for analyzing large spatial data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 24(3), 398–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-018-00348-w