Publication:

Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis

Date

Date

Date
2006
Journal Article
Published version
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-08-06T03:30:43Z
cris.lastimport.wos2025-08-13T01:30:42Z
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-22T14:27:06Z
dc.date.available2015-05-22T14:27:06Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstract

Analysis of subsurface stormflow from 147 storms at the 20 m long trench in the Panola Mountain Research Watershed by Tromp-van Meerveld and McDonnell (2006a) showed that there was a distinct 55 mm precipitation threshold for significant subsurface stormflow production. This second paper in the series investigates the processes responsible for this threshold response. We installed a dense spatial array of maximum rise crest stage gauges and recording wells on the hillslope and studied the temporal and spatial patterns of transient saturation at the soil-bedrock interface and its relation to subsurface stormflow measured at the trench face. Results show that while transient groundwater developed on parts of the hillslope during events smaller than 55 mm, it was not until more than 55 mm of rain fell before bedrock depressions on the hillslope were filled, water spilled over microtopographic relief in the bedrock surface, and the subsurface saturated areas became connected to the trench. When connectivity was achieved, the instantaneous subsurface stormflow rate increased more than fivefold compared to before the subsurface saturated areas were connected to the trench face. Total subsurface stormflow was more than 75 times larger when connectivity was achieved compared to when connectivity was not achieved. The fill and spill hypothesis presented in this paper is a process explanation for the observed threshold behavior of Tromp-van Meerveld and McDonnell (2006a), thereby linking patterns and processes.

dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2004WR003800
dc.identifier.issn0043-1397
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33645748698
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/108838
dc.identifier.wos000235970200002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subject.ddc910 Geography & travel
dc.title

Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleWater Resources Research
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameAmerican Geophysical Union
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestartonline
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume42
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.affiliationOregon State University, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology EPFL, Lausanne
uzh.contributor.affiliationOregon State University, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology EPFL, Lausanne
uzh.contributor.authorTromp-van Meerveld, H J
uzh.contributor.authorMcDonnell, J J
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.document.availabilitypublished_version
uzh.eprint.datestamp2015-05-22 14:27:06
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-08-13 01:36:16
uzh.eprint.statusChange2015-05-22 14:27:06
uzh.harvester.ethYes
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-110737
uzh.jdb.eprintsId26825
uzh.oastatus.unpaywallbronze
uzh.oastatus.zoraHybrid
uzh.publication.citationTromp-van Meerveld, H J; McDonnell, J J (2006). Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis. Water Resources Research, 42(2):online.
uzh.publication.freeAccessAtdoi
uzh.publication.originalworkoriginal
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.scopus.impact524
uzh.scopus.subjectsWater Science and Technology
uzh.workflow.doajuzh.workflow.doaj.false
uzh.workflow.eprintid110737
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatuspublic
uzh.workflow.revisions53
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
uzh.wos.impact191
Files

Original bundle

Name:
wrcr10238.pdf
Size:
2.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Publication available in collections: