Publication:

Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data

Date

Date

Date
2024
Journal Article
Published version
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-06-30T03:32:19Z
cris.lastimport.wos2025-07-31T01:32:38Z
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T08:46:31Z
dc.date.available2025-02-07T08:46:31Z
dc.date.issued2024-04
dc.description.abstract

AIM To compare implant survival and complication rates between shorter and standard-length implants with sinus augmentation and restored with single crowns, at 10 years of loading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS One-hundred and one patients (137 implants) with a ridge height of 5-7 mm in the posterior maxilla were randomly assigned to two treatment modalities: shorter implants (6 mm) (group short [GS]) or standard-length implants (11-15 mm) with sinus grafting (group graft [GG]). Following the insertion of final restorations, patients were regularly recalled for up to 10 years. Assessed outcomes encompassed implant survival, marginal bone levels (MBLs), biological and technical parameters and patient-reported outcome measures (OHIP-49 = Oral Health Impact Profile). Non-parametric statistical analysis was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS For the 5- to 10-year follow-up period, 77 patients with 105 implants (GS: 36 patients/48 implants; GG: 41/57) were available for re-examination (drop-out rate 21%). Implant survival rates at the patient level were 96.0% (GS; 2 failures) and 100% (GG) (inter-group p = .24). Median MBLs amounted to 0.00 mm (min 0.00; max 3.25; GS) and 0.00 mm (min 0.00; max 4.55; GG) (inter-group p = .73). Technical complications predominantly occurred within the first 5 years (inter-group p > .05). Peri-implantitis rates were 4.2% (GS) and 13.3% (GG) (intergroup p = .37). Median OHIP-49 scores were 7.00 (0.00; 39.00; GS) and 9.00 (0.00; 196; GG) (inter-group p = .61) at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS Based on similar 10-year implant survival rates, reduced patient morbidity and lower costs, the use of shorter dental implants might well serve as an alternative treatment concept to longer implants placed in conjunction with sinus grafting for patients with a limited ridge height in the posterior maxilla. Study register: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01030523.

dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcpe.13954
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85183929697
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/228052
dc.identifier.wos001155147100001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medicine & health
dc.title

Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleJournal of Clinical Periodontology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend509
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart499
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid38296249
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume51
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich
uzh.contributor.affiliationAkademie für orale Implantologie, Wien
uzh.contributor.affiliationPrivate Practice
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Santiago de Compostela
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Connecticut
uzh.contributor.affiliationPrivate Practice
uzh.contributor.affiliationAkademie für orale Implantologie, Wien
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich
uzh.contributor.authorThoma, Daniel S
uzh.contributor.authorHaas, Robert
uzh.contributor.authorSporniak-Tutak, Katarzyna
uzh.contributor.authorGarcia, Abel
uzh.contributor.authorTaylor, Thomas D
uzh.contributor.authorTutak, Marcin
uzh.contributor.authorPohl, Veronika
uzh.contributor.authorHämmerle, Christoph H F
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.document.availabilitypublished_version
uzh.eprint.datestamp2025-02-07 08:46:31
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-07-31 01:54:01
uzh.eprint.statusChange2025-02-07 08:46:31
uzh.harvester.ethYes
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-271195
uzh.jdb.eprintsId13662
uzh.note.publicThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Thoma, Daniel S; Haas, Robert; Sporniak-Tutak, Katarzyna; Garcia, Abel; Taylor, Thomas D; Tutak, Marcin; Pohl, Veronika; Hämmerle, Christoph H F (2024). Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 51(4):499-509, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13954 . This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. (http://www.wileyauthors.com/self-archiving)
uzh.oastatus.unpaywallhybrid
uzh.oastatus.zoraHybrid
uzh.publication.citationThoma, Daniel S; Haas, Robert; Sporniak-Tutak, Katarzyna; Garcia, Abel; Taylor, Thomas D; Tutak, Marcin; Pohl, Veronika; Hämmerle, Christoph H F (2024). Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 51(4):499-509.
uzh.publication.freeAccessAtdoi
uzh.publication.originalworkoriginal
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.scopus.impact11
uzh.scopus.subjectsPeriodontics
uzh.workflow.doajuzh.workflow.doaj.false
uzh.workflow.eprintid271195
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatuspublic
uzh.workflow.revisions32
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.sourcePubMed:PMID:38296249
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
uzh.wos.impact11
Files

Original bundle

Name:
33_J_Clinic_Periodontology___2024___Thoma___Randomized_controlled_multi_E2_80_90centre_study_comparing_shorter_dental_implants__6_mm_.pdf
Size:
1.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Publication available in collections: