Publication: Biomechanical evaluation of two intramedullary nailing techniques with different locking options in a three-part fracture proximal humerus model
Biomechanical evaluation of two intramedullary nailing techniques with different locking options in a three-part fracture proximal humerus model
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Rothstock, S., Plecko, M., Kloub, M., Schiuma, D., Windolf, M., & Gueorguiev, B. (2012). Biomechanical evaluation of two intramedullary nailing techniques with different locking options in a three-part fracture proximal humerus model. Clinical Biomechanics, 27, 686–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.03.003
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteosynthesis of unstable proximal humerus fractures still remains challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate two intramedullary nailing techniques with different locking options in a three-part fracture model and prove whether two new fixation concepts, introducing additional locking screw-in-screws inserted through the head of the proximal screws, and a calcar screw, provide better stability. METHODS: A biomechanical testing model for three-part proximal humerus fractures including cyclic axial loading with i
Metrics
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
Publisher
Publisher
Publisher
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Views
Citations
Rothstock, S., Plecko, M., Kloub, M., Schiuma, D., Windolf, M., & Gueorguiev, B. (2012). Biomechanical evaluation of two intramedullary nailing techniques with different locking options in a three-part fracture proximal humerus model. Clinical Biomechanics, 27, 686–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.03.003