Publication: Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes
Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Dames, H., Musfeld, P., Popov, V., Oberauer, K., & Frischkorn, G. T. (2024). Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes. Meta-Psychology, 8, 3735. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2023.3735
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
We appreciate the initiative to seek for ways to improve academic assessment by broadening the range of relevant research contributions and by considering a candidate’s scientific rigor. Evaluating a candidate's ability to contribute to science is a complex process that cannot be captured through one metric alone. While the proposed changes have some advantages, such as an increased focus on quality over quantity, the proposal's focus on adherence to open science practices is not sufficient, as it undervalues theory building and forma
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Citations
Dames, H., Musfeld, P., Popov, V., Oberauer, K., & Frischkorn, G. T. (2024). Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes. Meta-Psychology, 8, 3735. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2023.3735
